Bill · S. 485· Senate(119-S-485)
Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 2/6/2025
- Last activity
- 2/6/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Rand Paul
- Cosponsors
- - 23 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2025" seeks to change how the executive branch implements major rules. Under this bill, major rules would not take effect unless Congress passes a joint resolution of approval. The Act aims to increase accountability and transparency in the federal regulatory process. It requires agencies to submit detailed reports, including cost-benefit analyses, to Congress and the Comptroller General. Furthermore, it establishes specific procedures for congressional review of both major and nonmajor rules. Finally, the bill includes provisions for the expiration of major rules after ten years unless extended.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The act mandates the publication of data, studies, and cost-benefit analyses to increase public access to regulatory information.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+2
Increased transparency and cost-benefit analysis requirements may prevent unexpected regulatory costs for small businesses.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+2
By limiting federal agency autonomy, the bill shifts more oversight and potential decision-making power to the legislative branch.
The opposite· 3 of 12
Does this give the federal government more power?-5
The bill explicitly seeks to reduce the power of the executive branch by shifting rule-making authority toward Congress.
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?-3
The mandate for congressional approval of major rules may delay the implementation of environmental and climate regulations.
Does this make the country readier for the next outbreak?-3
The requirement for congressional approval could delay rapid regulatory responses to public health emergencies.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Accountability and Transparency: The Act aims to ensure that the legislative branch retains oversight of the laws being imposed on the American people (Section 2).
-
Improved Regulatory Information: Federal agencies would be required to publish a list of information their rules are based on, including data, scientific and economic studies, and cost-benefit analyses (Section 801(a)(1)(A)).
-
Detailed Job Impact Data: Agencies must submit a cost-benefit analysis that includes an analysis of any jobs added or lost, distinguishing between public and private sector jobs (Section 801(a)(1)(B)(i)).
-
Public Access to Guidance: The bill requires Federal agencies to publish guidance documents on a specific internet website designated by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (Section 812(d)(1)).
-
Protection Against Unforeseen Unlawful Conduct: The Act provides an affirmative defense for individuals who could not anticipate that their conduct would be unlawful based on the statutory language of a rule (Section 806).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Delayed Implementation of Rules: Major rules cannot take effect until a joint resolution of approval is enacted, which may delay necessary regulatory actions (Section 801(a)(3)).
-
Potential Threats to Safety or Security: While the President can bypass the approval process for one 90-day period for matters involving imminent threats to health or safety, national security, or criminal law enforcement, the standard process remains a requirement (Section 801(c)).
-
Expiration of Existing Rules: Major rules will cease to have effect after 10 years unless Congress passes a joint resolution of extension (Section 813(a)(1)).
-
Increased Regulatory Burden on Agencies: Agencies are required to undergo extensive reporting, including providing information to the Comptroller General and submitting annual reports for the review of eligible rules (Section 801(a)(1) and Section 814(a)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+2Improves Consumer Protection-2Increases Job Creation-2Reduces Government Spending-2Improves Economic Growth-1Reduces National Debt-1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Reduces Carbon Emissions-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5Increase States Rights+2Improves Privacy Rights+1Increases Federal Power-5
- Healthcare
- Improves Pandemic Preparedness-3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+2Good For Union Workers-2Good For Low Income Households-1
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding-1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Affordable Housing-1
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/12/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/6/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- 18 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
John CurtisRepublican · Utah
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Chuck GrassleyRepublican · Iowa
Jon HustedRepublican · Ohio
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
Bernie MorenoRepublican · Ohio
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Eric SchmittRepublican · Missouri
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana