Bill · S. 3048· Senate(119-S-3048)
TREATS Act
- Introduced
- 10/23/2025
- Last activity
- 10/23/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- Sponsored by
- Lisa Murkowski
- Cosponsors
- - 3 - 19
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Telehealth Response for E-prescribing Addiction Therapy Services Act or the TREATS Act. It amends the Controlled Substances Act to allow for the use of telehealth in substance use disorder treatment. Specifically, it changes the requirements for prescribing certain controlled substances approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating substance use disorders. Instead of only allowing in-person evaluations, the bill permits a telehealth evaluation. A telehealth evaluation is defined as a medical evaluation conducted by a remote practitioner using specific telecommunications systems.
Yes· 3 of 9
Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths?+8
By allowing telehealth evaluations for substance use disorder treatments, the bill improves the response to addiction crises and lowers barriers to care.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+7
Rural residents who lack local addiction specialists benefit greatly from the ability to receive telehealth evaluations.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+7
The bill expands healthcare access by permitting telehealth evaluations for substance use disorder treatment medications.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 2 allows for 1 telehealth evaluation of a patient for the purpose of prescribing a controlled substance in schedule III, IV, or V that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating a substance use disorder. This is positive because it gives patients the option to be evaluated remotely using audio-only or audio and video equipment instead of being forced to always have an in-person medical evaluation first.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions outlining negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+7Good For Low Income Households+6Good For Middle Aged+5Good For Middle Class Households+5Good For People With Disabilities+5Good For Veterans+5Good For Young Adults+5
- Healthcare
- Improves Opioid Crisis Response+8Improves Healthcare Access+7
- 6/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/27/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/23/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- 19 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Jon OssoffDemocrat · Georgia
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts