Bill · S. 1829· Senate(119-S-1829)
Strengthening Transparency and Obligations to Protect Children Suffering from Abuse and Mistreatment Act of 2025
A bill to combat the sexual exploitation of children by supporting victims and promoting accountability and transparency by the tech industry.
- Introduced
- 5/21/2025
- Last activity
- 6/26/2025 — Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 106.
- Sponsored by
- Josh Hawley
- Cosponsors
- - 15 - 13
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
The "STOP CSAM Act of 2025" aims to combat the sexual exploitation of children by increasing transparency and accountability within the tech industry. It updates federal law to expand the definitions of psychological abuse and exploitation to better protect child victims. The legislation strengthens protections for "covered persons" in federal court by expanding what constitutes protected information. It also updates reporting requirements for service providers to the CyberTipline. Additionally, the bill expands civil remedies, allowing victims to seek damages from online platforms and app stores. Finally, it establishes new regulations for restitution and the use of trustees for victim payments.
Yes· 3 of 5
Would children be better off under this?+10
The bill significantly strengthens protections, support, and legal remedies for victims of child sexual exploitation.
Does this put more rules on large technology companies?+7
The bill establishes significant new regulatory duties and liability risks for digital service providers to combat child sexual exploitation.
Does this give people more control over their personal data?+5
It expands the definition of protected information to include social media handles and online identifiers for child victims.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-5
Tech companies and service providers face higher compliance costs and legal risks.
Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?-3
Increased liabilities for platforms could potentially impact how they moderate or host content.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Enhanced Protections for Victims: The bill expands the definition of "psychological abuse" to include coercive tactics like isolation or withholding food, which provides clearer legal standing for certain types of abuse (Section 2, subsection a, paragraph 1, clause C, paragraph 5).
-
Increased Privacy for Witnesses: By expanding the definition of "protected information" to include social media handles, online identifiers, names, addresses, and medical or educational records, the bill offers better privacy safeguards for victims and witnesses (Section 2, subsection a, paragraph 1, clause G, paragraph 13, clause A; Section 2, amending subsection (d)).
-
Strengthened Victim Support in Court: The bill mandates that probation officers request information from multidisciplinary child abuse teams to better understand the impact of an offense on child victims (Section 2, subsection a, paragraph 5, subsection f, paragraph 1).
-
New Legal Recourse for Victims: The legislation creates a new private right of action, allowing victims of child pornography or exploitation—regardless of when the injury occurred—to sue online platforms and app stores for damages (Section 5, subsection b, paragraph 1; Section 5, amending section 2255).
-
Improved Restitution Management: The bill allows courts to appoint trustees or fiduciaries to manage restitution payments for victims who are minors, incompetent, or foreign citizens, ensuring the funds are used in their best interests (Section 2, subsection a, paragraph 6, subsection h, paragraph 4, clause (1); Section 2, amending section 3664).
-
Increased Accountability for Tech Companies: Service providers are now required to submit detailed reports to the CyberTipline regarding the detection and handling of apparent child pornography, including information about the subject's identity and location (Section 4, amending section 2258A).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Financial Burdens on Tech Providers: Service providers face significant criminal and civil penalties, including fines of up to $1,000,000 or more, for failing to comply with new reporting and preservation requirements (Section 4, subsection e, paragraph 1; Section 4, subsection e, paragraph 2; Section 4, amending section 2258A).
-
Increased Litigation for Online Platforms: By expanding civil remedies, the bill opens the door for more lawsuits against interactive computer services and app stores regarding the hosting or promotion of illegal content (Section 5, subsection b, paragraph 1; Section 5, subsection b, paragraph 2).
-
Potential for Misuse of Civil Litigation: The bill includes provisions for sanctions if a court finds that a party has brought a "bad faith civil action" or raised a "bad faith defense," which may happen if the party knew the material did not involve a minor or the defense was intended to delay proceedings (Section 5, amending section 2255A).
-
Increased Costs for Defendants in Restitution Cases: When a court appoints a trustee to manage restitution, it may order the defendant to pay the fees of that trustee (Section 2, amending section 3664).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation+7Improves Data Privacy+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Privacy Rights+5Increases Federal Power+5Improves Freedom Of Speech-3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+10Good For Business Owners-5
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/28/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/13/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 6/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/15/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/1/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/29/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/26/2025
- Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 106.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/12/2025
- Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- 6/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- Alan Armstrong
Republican · Oklahoma
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Chuck GrassleyRepublican · Iowa
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
Ashley MoodyRepublican · Florida
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina