RepublicanBill · S. 1756· Senate(119-S-1756)

Conscience Protection Act of 2025

Rep. Lankford
Age: 58 years
Oklahoma
Introduced
5/14/2025
Last activity
3/19/2026 — Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Sponsored by
James Lankford
Cosponsors
Republican - 23Democrat - 0
Health
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill amends the Public Health Service Act to prohibit the Federal Government, States, local governments, and any entities receiving Federal financial assistance from discriminating against health care entities that decline to provide, perform, refer for, pay for, or sponsor abortions or abortion coverage. It strengthens the implementation and enforcement of Federal conscience laws by directing the Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Health and Human Services to receive and promptly investigate complaints of violations. The bill authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services to terminate Federal financial assistance to individuals or entities that fail to comply with these conscience laws. Additionally, the legislation creates a private right of action, allowing the Attorney General or any adversely affected party to bring a civil action in court for actual or threatened violations without needing to exhaust administrative remedies first. Courts are required to grant appropriate relief in these civil actions, including injunctive relief, declaratory relief, compensatory damages against governmental entities, and reasonable attorneys' fees for prevailing plaintiffs. The bill also includes a severability clause ensuring that if any part of the Act is found unconstitutional, the remaining provisions will stay in effect.

Yes

  • Does this protect the freedom to practise a religion?+8

    The bill provides strong protections for the rights of conscience and religious beliefs of health care entities.

  • Does this give the federal government more power?+5

    The bill expands the authority of the Secretary of HHS to regulate and induce compliance through termination of funds.

  • Does this leave more decisions to the states?+4

    The bill protects the ability of states to operate according to their own laws regarding conscience rights.

The opposite

  • Does this make abortion easier to get?-7

    The bill specifically protects the rights of health care entities to decline participation in abortion services, which may limit accessibility.

  • Would women be better off under this?-6

    By protecting entities that do not participate in abortion, the bill may reduce access to these services for women.