Bill · S. 1504· Senate(119-S-1504)
Claiming Age Clarity Act
- Introduced
- 4/29/2025
- Last activity
- 4/29/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- Sponsored by
- Bill Cassidy
- Cosponsors
- - 6 - 7
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Claiming Age Clarity Act requires the Social Security Administration to update its terminology. The Commissioner must change how specific retirement ages are described in all rules, regulations, guidance, and other materials, whether they are printed or online. This includes replacing terms like "early eligibility age" and "full retirement age" with new phrasing. The bill also aims to remove the term "delayed retirement credit." These changes must be completed no later than January 1, 2027.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+2
Seniors benefit from clearer understanding of their benefit eligibility ages through updated language.
Would retired people be better off under this?+2
Retirees gain clarity on how their benefits are categorized via the new standardized age terminology.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+2
The bill enhances transparency by updating outdated and potentially confusing Social Security terminology.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Terminology Updates: The bill replaces several existing terms with new ones, such as replacing "early eligibility age" with "minimum monthly benefit age" (Section 2, subsection 1).
- Standardization of Language: The Act mandates that "full retirement age" and "normal retirement age" be replaced with "standard monthly benefit age" (Section 2, subsection 2).
- Clarity on Maximum Age: The bill replaces references to age 70 as the maximum age for delayed retirement credits with the term "maximum monthly benefit age" (Section 2, subsection 3).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Retirees+2Good For Seniors+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Social Security+2
- 4/27/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/10/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/7/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/18/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/29/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
John CurtisRepublican · Utah
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Jon HustedRepublican · Ohio
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana