Bill · S. 1234· Senate(119-S-1234)
SSI Savings Penalty Elimination Act
- Introduced
- 4/1/2025
- Last activity
- 4/1/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- Sponsored by
- Catherine Cortez Masto
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 9
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "SSI Savings Penalty Elimination Act," aims to amend title XVI of the Social Security Act. It seeks to update the resource limits required for Supplemental Security Income eligibility. Specifically, it proposes increasing the resource limit for individuals and couples. The bill also establishes a method for these limits to be adjusted for inflation in subsequent years.
Yes· 3 of 6
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+8
The increase in SSI resource limits directly benefits many seniors who rely on these safety net programs.
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+8
The bill specifically targets resource limits for the SSI program, which is a vital resource for many people with disabilities.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+7
The bill provides significant relief for low-income individuals by allowing them to retain more assets while qualifying for SSI.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased resource limits for individuals: The bill raises the limit for individuals from $2,250 to $20,000 in the calendar year 2025 (Section 2(a)(1)). This change could benefit people by allowing them to hold more assets while remaining eligible for the program.
-
Increased resource limits for couples: The bill raises the limit for couples from $1,500 to $10,000 in the calendar year 2025 (Section 2(a)(2)). This could help couples maintain their eligibility even if they have higher combined resources.
-
Inflation adjustments: The bill amends the law to ensure that resource limits are increased in each calendar year after 2025 based on a calculation involving the consumer price index (Section 2(b)). This could prevent the resource limits from being eroded by inflation over time.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For People With Disabilities+8Good For Seniors+8Good For Low Income Households+7Good For Retirees+7
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Social Security+7Improves Poverty Reduction+6
- 7/21/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 7/13/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/29/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/1/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- 9 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
Bill CassidyRepublican · Louisiana
Ted CruzRepublican · Texas
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Jon HustedRepublican · Ohio
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Lisa MurkowskiRepublican · Alaska
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island