Bill · H.Res. 59· House(119-HRES-59)
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the sermon given by the Right Reverend Mariann Edgar Budde at the National Prayer Service on January 21st, 2025, at the National Cathedral was a display of political activism and condemning its distorted message.
- Introduced
- 1/23/2025
- Last activity
- 1/23/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Sponsored by
- Josh Brecheen
- Cosponsors
- - 22 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses the view of the House of Representatives regarding a specific religious service. It states that the sermon given by the Right Reverend Mariann Edgar Budde at the National Prayer Service on January 21, 2025, at the National Cathedral was a display of political activism. The text notes that the National Prayer Service is a tradition meant to affirm dependence on God and pray for the success of the President and Vice President. It also states that the bishop used her position inappropriately by promoting political bias instead of biblical teaching. Finally, the resolution formally condemns her message.
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite
Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?-4
The resolution's condemnation of a specific sermon may have a chilling effect on the free expression of clergy during public services.
Does this protect the freedom to practise a religion?-3
The resolution targets and condemns a specific religious leader's sermon, which may be perceived as a criticism of religious expression.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline positive outcomes, benefits, or positive impacts for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences, burdens, or negative impacts for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Freedom Of Speech-4
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Religious Freedom-3
- 1/28/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/23/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 20 Cosponsors added.
Rick AllenRepublican · Georgia
Stephanie BiceRepublican · Oklahoma
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
James BairdRepublican · Indiana
Eric BurlisonRepublican · Missouri
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Andrew ClydeRepublican · Georgia
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
H. GriffithRepublican · Virginia
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Marjorie GreeneRepublican · Georgia
Erin HouchinRepublican · Indiana
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Anna Paulina LunaRepublican · Florida
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Daniel WebsterRepublican · Florida