Bill · H.Res. 421· House(119-HRES-421)
Resolution memorializing law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty.
- Introduced
- 5/15/2025
- Last activity
- 5/15/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Michael Guest
- Cosponsors
- - 26 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution is a formal acknowledgment meant to honor law enforcement officers who have died in the line of duty. It recognizes the service, valor, and integrity of Federal, State, local, and Tribal police officers and sheriffs. The document highlights the history of Peace Officers Memorial Day and National Police Week. It specifically memorializes 345 law enforcement officers whose stories were recovered during 2024. Finally, the resolution expresses support for the law enforcement community and offers condolences to the families of fallen officers.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Recognition of Fallen Officers: The resolution acknowledges that law enforcement personnel who have made the ultimate sacrifice should be remembered and honored (Resolution, Section 1).
-
Support for Community Safety: It expresses unwavering support for officers across the United States as they work to preserve safe and secure communities (Resolution, Section 2).
-
Emphasis on Officer Safety: The resolution recognizes the necessity of ensuring officers have the proper equipment, training, and resources to protect their own health and safety while they protect the public (Resolution, Section 3).
-
Support for Families: The text expresses condolences and solemn appreciation to the loved ones of law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty (Resolution, Section 5).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are mentioned in the text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
No significant interests or groups are affected by this bill.
- 5/21/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/15/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 24 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Robert AderholtRepublican · Alabama
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Aaron BeanRepublican · Florida
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Tony GonzalesRepublican · Texas
Trent KellyRepublican · Mississippi
Julia LetlowRepublican · Louisiana
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Nancy MaceRepublican · South Carolina
Michael McCaulRepublican · Texas
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Riley MooreRepublican · West Virginia
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Burgess OwensRepublican · Utah
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Mike RogersRepublican · Alabama
David RouzerRepublican · North Carolina
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Dale StrongRepublican · Alabama
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
Tim WalbergRepublican · Michigan
Ann WagnerRepublican · Missouri
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin