Bill · H.Res. 364· House(119-HRES-364)
Calling upon local communities to support organizations that provide resources and aid Gold Shield Families in their time of need.
- Introduced
- 4/30/2025
- Last activity
- 5/13/2025 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Sponsored by
- Daniel Meuser
- Cosponsors
- - 13 - 4
- Introduced
- Adopted by the House
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
H. Res. 364 recognizes the courage of first responders and the sacrifices of their families. It specifically acknowledges Gold Shield Families, who are families of various emergency service providers lost in the line of duty. The resolution notes that nonprofits provide these families with resources and support. It resolves that local communities should support these nonprofits. Additionally, it resolves that Gold Shield Families should use these resources.
Yes· 3 of 7
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+3
Encourages aid from nonprofits to assist families in financial hardship following a death.
Would children be better off under this?+2
Provides support systems for children of fallen first responders.
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+2
Provides support systems for young adults of fallen first responders.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Support for Gold Shield Families: The resolution encourages local communities to support nonprofits that provide aid and resources to families of fallen first responders during times of grief and hardship. (Resolved section 1)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts for individuals or groups are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Children+2Good For Middle Aged+2Good For Middle Class Households+2Good For Seniors+2Good For Young Adults+2
- Healthcare
- Improves Mental Health Access+2
- 5/13/2025
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1960)
- On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1960)
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 364.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1960-1961)
- Mr. Onder moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 5/8/2025
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 5/7/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/6/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 4/30/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Robert BresnahanRepublican · Pennsylvania
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Pat FallonRepublican · Texas
Jared GoldenDemocrat · Maine
J. HillRepublican · Arkansas
David KustoffRepublican · Tennessee
Anna Paulina LunaRepublican · Florida
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Nicole MalliotakisRepublican · New York
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Nellie PouDemocrat · New Jersey
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York