RepublicanBill · H.Res. 1042· House(119-HRES-1042)

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2189) to modernize Federal firearms laws to account for advancements in technology and less-than-lethal weapons, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 261) to amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to prohibit requiring an authorization for the installation, continued presence, operation, maintenance, repair, or recovery of undersea fiber optic cables in a national marine sanctuary if such activities have previously been authorized by a Federal or State agency; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3617) to amend the Department of Energy Organization Act to secure the supply of critical energy resources, including critical minerals and other materials, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

Rep. Langworthy
Age: 45 years
New York
Introduced
2/9/2026
Last activity
2/10/2026 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Sponsored by
Nicholas Langworthy
Cosponsors
None
Congress
  1. Introduced
  2. Failed

A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This resolution provides for the consideration of several different bills in the House of Representatives. It addresses H.R. 2189, which aims to modernize Federal firearms laws regarding technology and less-than-lethal weapons. It also provides for H.R. 261, which seeks to amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act regarding undersea fiber optic cables. Additionally, it covers H.R. 3617, which intends to amend the Department of Energy Organization Act to secure critical energy resources and minerals. Finally, the resolution includes a provision regarding the calculation of calendar days for terminating specific national emergencies.

Yes· 3 of 5

  • Would business owners be better off under this?+2

    Reducing regulatory requirements for undersea cables and securing energy resources benefits various industrial sectors.

  • Does this make it easier to run a small business?+2

    Streamlining authorization for undersea cables reduces regulatory hurdles for telecommunications businesses.

  • Does this get reliable internet to more people?+1

    Streamlining undersea cable maintenance through updated authorization rules supports internet connectivity infrastructure.

The opposite

  • Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-2

    Prohibiting new authorizations for undersea cables in marine sanctuaries may reduce oversight for activities in those protected areas.

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?-1

    Adjusting the calculation of calendar days for terminating national emergencies reduces the immediate transparency of emergency expirations.

What Congress actually voted on

2 recorded votes have been taken on this bill. One of them decided something; the rest moved it along.

  • The House: the vote on whether to adopt the resolutionFailed 214–217

    A resolution is one chamber speaking for itself — setting its own rules, taking a position, honouring someone — and it never goes to the President. Agreeing to it is the whole decision.

    02/10/2026 · Roll call 60 · recorded as “On Agreeing to the Resolution”