Bill · H.R. 9688· House(119-HR-9688)
High Court Gift Ban Act
- Introduced
- 7/14/2026
- Last activity
- 7/14/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Jamie Raskin
- Cosponsors
- - 44 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The bill is known as the High Court Gift Ban Act. It prohibits federal judges from receiving gifts valued over $50 in a single instance or over $100 in the aggregate in a year from a single source, unless an exception applies. The bill lists specific exceptions, such as gifts from relatives, items paid for at fair market value, and certain educational awards or travel reimbursements. It requires the Judicial Conference or designated officials to refer suspected violations to the Attorney General. The Attorney General may then bring civil actions or pursue criminal penalties for knowing and willful violations. Finally, the Supreme Court and the Judicial Conference must issue regulations to carry out this section within 180 days of enactment.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+6
The bill increases transparency by strictly regulating and restricting gifts received by federal judicial officers.
Does this limit the influence of paid lobbyists?+4
Limits on gifts to federal judges reduce potential undue influence and enhance ethical standards.
Does this give the federal government more power?+2
The bill establishes federal statutory gift bans and enforcement mechanisms for federal judges.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Limits Gifts to Federal Judges: Under Section 2 (adding Sec. 7354(a)(1)), judicial officers are generally prohibited from accepting gifts valued over $50 per instance or $100 total per year from a single source. This may benefit the public by ensuring that judges are less susceptible to outside influence through gifts.
-
Maintains Allowances for Personal and Professional Exceptions: Under Section 2 (adding Sec. 7354(a)(2)), exceptions are made for things like gifts from relatives, items paid for at fair market value, public benefits, and personal hospitality. This allows judges to maintain normal personal and family relationships without running afoul of the law.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Potential Enforcement Burdens and Legal Costs: Under Section 2 (adding Sec. 7354(b)), the Judicial Conference must refer suspected violations to the Attorney General, who may bring civil actions or criminal penalties. This enforcement mechanism could create administrative burdens and legal costs for the government and the judicial system.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+6Reduces Lobbying+4Increases Federal Power+2
- 9/28/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/14/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 41 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Nikki BudzinskiDemocrat · Illinois
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Rosa DeLauroDemocrat · Connecticut
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lizzie FletcherDemocrat · Texas
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrat · New York
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Linda SánchezDemocrat · California
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia