Bill · H.R. 5437· House(119-HR-5437)
Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act
- Introduced
- 9/17/2025
- Last activity
- 6/3/2026 — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 16 - 7.
- Sponsored by
- Tom McClintock
- Cosponsors
- - 16 - 0
- Introduced
What this bill would do
The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act aims to stop civil lawsuits against those who make or sell stone slab products. It specifically targets actions brought due to injuries caused by the alteration of these products by third-party fabricators, such as exposure to silica dust. The bill finds that these products are not inherently dangerous and that manufacturers have no control over how fabricators work. By prohibiting these "qualified civil actions," the bill seeks to protect the stone industry from what it describes as frivolous lawsuits. It also mandates the dismissal of any such pending legal actions once the act is passed.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would business owners be better off under this?+5
The bill protects manufacturers and sellers from liability for injuries caused during product fabrication by third parties.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+3
The bill protects manufacturers, sellers, and distributors from the burden of certain civil liability lawsuits.
Is this likely to create jobs?+2
The bill seeks to preserve a lawful industry that employs tens of thousands of Americans.
The opposite
Would union members be better off under this?-6
The bill eliminates the ability for workers to sue manufacturers or sellers for injuries related to silica exposure during fabrication.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-5
The bill limits the ability of injured parties to seek legal recourse through the court system.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?-4
The bill reduces the legal recourse available to workers who may suffer injuries from silica exposure.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection for Industry Businesses: The bill protects manufacturers, sellers, importers, distributors, retailers, and suppliers from being held liable for injuries caused during the fabrication process (Section 2, Section 4).
-
Preservation of Industry and Jobs: The act aims to preserve a lawful industry that currently employs tens of thousands of Americans across several States (Section 2).
-
Protection of Consumer Supply: The bill is intended to preserve consumers' access to a supply of stone slab products (Section 2).
-
Legal System Efficiency: By preventing what it deems as a proliferation of frivolous lawsuits, the bill seeks to stop the straining of legal resources to ensure deserving parties can access relief (Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of Legal Recourse for Injured Workers: The bill prohibits civil actions against manufacturers or sellers for injuries related to the fabrication of products, including those caused by exposure to respirable silica or other substances (Section 2, Section 3).
-
Dismissal of Existing Lawsuits: Any pending "qualified civil actions" must be dismissed by the court as soon as it is practicable after the act is enacted (Section 3).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+5Good For Union Workers-6Good For Low Income Households-4
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+3Increases Job Creation+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+2Improves Due Process-5
- 6/3/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 16 - 7.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/12/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 9/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/17/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Aaron BeanRepublican · Florida
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Tom EmmerRepublican · Minnesota
Michelle FischbachRepublican · Minnesota
Brad FinstadRepublican · Minnesota
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Darrell IssaRepublican · California
Brian JackRepublican · Georgia
Barry LoudermilkRepublican · Georgia
Laurel LeeRepublican · Florida
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey
Matt Van EppsRepublican · Tennessee