Bill · H.R. 400· House(119-HR-400)
No taxpayer funding for United Nations Human Rights Council Act
- Introduced
- 1/14/2025
- Last activity
- 1/14/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Chip Roy
- Cosponsors
- - 10 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "No taxpayer funding for United Nations Human Rights Council Act," seeks to stop money from going to the United Nations Human Rights Council. It instructs the Secretary of State to withhold a specific amount from the United States' regular annual contribution to the United Nations budget. This amount is calculated based on the percentage that would be used to support the Human Rights Council. Additionally, the bill prevents any voluntary contributions from being made to the Council. Any funds withheld through this process are officially rescinded and are not considered money owed to any United Nations entity.
Yes
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+5
The bill reduces government spending by withholding a portion of the regular United Nations contribution and prohibiting voluntary contributions to the Human Rights Council.
The opposite
Does this send more money or help to other countries?-5
The bill reduces international financial support by withholding funds that would have gone to the United Nations Human Rights Council.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Reduction in specific funding: The bill aims to prevent United States funds from being used to support the United Nations Human Rights Council by withholding a portion of the regular United Nations contribution (Section 2(a)(1)).
-
Prevention of voluntary spending: The bill prohibits the government from making any voluntary contributions specifically to the United Nations Human Rights Council (Section 2(a)(2)).
-
Permanent removal of funds: Once the Secretary of State withholds the money, those funds are rescinded and are not treated as debts that must be repaid to any United Nations entity (Section 2(b)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are mentioned: The provided text does not list any negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+5
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Increases Foreign Aid-5
- 6/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/14/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Mike FloodRepublican · Nebraska
Diana HarshbargerRepublican · Tennessee
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Riley MooreRepublican · West Virginia
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
David RouzerRepublican · North Carolina
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas