DemocratBill · H.R. 3199· House(119-HR-3199)

Captive Primate Safety Act of 2025

Rep. Quigley
Age: 68 years
Illinois
Introduced
5/5/2025
Last activity
5/5/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Sponsored by
Mike Quigley
Cosponsors
Democrat - 45Republican - 8
Animals
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill is called the Captive Primate Safety Act of 2025. It amends the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to make certain activities involving prohibited primate species illegal. The bill bans importing, exporting, transporting, selling, receiving, acquiring, purchasing, breeding, or possessing certain primates. It defines prohibited primate species to include chimpanzees, galagos, gibbons, gorillas, lemurs, loris, monkeys, orangutans, tarsiers, and hybrids. The legislation also provides specific exemptions for certain entities like research facilities and people who already possess these animals, provided they follow strict rules.

Yes· 3 of 5

  • Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+7

    The bill directly improves environmental protections by restricting activities involving specific primate species, contributing to their conservation and well-being.

  • Would children be better off under this?+3

    The bill is somewhat good for children by reducing the risk of direct contact with primates and thereby potentially reducing risk of diseases or injuries.

  • Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+1

    The bill has a slightly positive impact as it supports ethical treatment of animals, which might align with the values of some young adults.

The opposite· 3 of 4

  • Would business owners be better off under this?-3

    This bill could negatively impact business owners who breed or sell primates, restricting their commercial activities.

  • Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-1

    This bill has a slightly negative impact on high-net-worth individuals who keep primates as pets due to new restrictions.

  • Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?-1

    This bill has a slightly negative impact on ultra-high-net-worth individuals who keep primates as pets due to new restrictions.