Bill · H.R. 3197· House(119-HR-3197)
Fortifying U.S. Markets From Chinese Military Aggression Act
- Introduced
- 5/5/2025
- Last activity
- 5/5/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- Sponsored by
- Zachary Nunn
- Cosponsors
- - 12 - 6
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, called the "Fortifying U.S. Markets From Chinese Military Aggression Act," aims to create an Advisory Committee to study and report on the economic fallout from potential Chinese military actions against Taiwan. The committee will focus on market implications, vulnerabilities, and communication between relevant parties. The bill also requires an annual public report detailing market vulnerabilities and recommending actions to make U.S. capital markets more resilient.
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
The creation of an Advisory Committee on Economic Fallout From Chinese Military Aggression Towards Taiwan (SEC. 2) could help the U.S. prepare for and mitigate economic strain and market volatility related to potential Chinese aggression in Taiwan. This preparation could protect the financial well-being of individuals by stabilizing markets.
-
The annual report (SEC. 2(l)) detailing market vulnerabilities and recommending actions for regulators could make U.S. capital markets more resilient against market shocks and volatility. This resilience would help to secure investments and retirement funds of individuals.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no explicitly stated negative impacts for people in the provided sections of the bill.
Yes· 3 of 15
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+3
The bill implicitly supports Taiwan, strengthening alliances.
Does this give the federal government more power?+2
The bill increases federal power by establishing an advisory committee.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+2
The bill mandates a public report, increasing transparency.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Billionaires+1Good For Business Owners+1Good For High Income Households+1Good For High Net Worth Individuals+1Good For Low Income Households+1Good For Middle Aged+1Good For Middle Class Households+1Good For Retirees+1Good For Seniors+1Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+2Increases Federal Power+2
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+3Improves Diplomatic Engagement+1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+2
- 3/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/31/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/17/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/15/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/14/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/5/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Ed CaseDemocrat · Hawaii
Monica De La CruzRepublican · Texas
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
Andrew GarbarinoRepublican · New York
Mike HaridopolosRepublican · Florida
Young KimRepublican · California
Frank LucasRepublican · Oklahoma
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Lisa McClainRepublican · Michigan
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Marlin StutzmanRepublican · Indiana
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia