Bill · H.R. 1897· House(119-HR-1897)
ESA Amendments Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 3/6/2025
- Last activity
- 4/20/2026 — Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1189 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4690, H. Res. 1182, H.R. 1897 and H.R. 5587. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4690, H. Res. 1182, H.R. 1897, and H.R. 5587 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 4690, H.R. 1897, and H.R. 5587.
- Sponsored by
- Bruce Westerman
- Cosponsors
- - 26 - 0
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "ESA Amendments Act of 2025," seeks to amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973. It focuses on optimizing conservation by prioritizing resources and incentivizing wildlife conservation on private lands. The legislation aims to provide greater incentives for species recovery while increasing transparency and accountability. Additionally, it seeks to streamline the permitting process and eliminate various barriers to conservation. Finally, the bill intends to restore congressional intent by limiting agency regulations.
Yes· 3 of 7
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+6
The bill requires the publication of scientific data and annual reports on government expenditures to a public database.
Would business owners be better off under this?+5
The bill provides new conservation benefit agreements that offer regulatory certainty for private property owners.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+5
The bill reduces potential land use restrictions and streamlines the permitting process for businesses.
The opposite
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-4
The bill limits critical habitat designations and restricts the scope of judicial review for species delisting.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Incentivizing Private Land Conservation: The bill introduces Conservation Benefit Agreements which allow covered parties, such as private property owners, to enter into agreements to enhance the propagation or survival of affected species (Section 201).
-
Providing Assurances to Landowners: Under the new Conservation Benefit Agreements, the Secretary provides assurances that if a species becomes listed, no additional conservation measures or land use restrictions will be imposed on the covered party (Section 201).
-
Increased Transparency in Decision Making: The bill requires the Secretary to make the best scientific and commercial data used for regulations available on a public website (Section 401).
-
Greater Accountability for Expenditures: The legislation requires an annual report detailing Federal Government expenditures for covered suits, which will be made available through a searchable internet database (Section 403).
-
Support for State Management: The bill provides for the possibility of State management of a species once specific, objective, incremental recovery goals are met (Section 301).
-
Streamlining Permitting for Economic Stability: The bill expands the exemption process for agency actions that may otherwise impair national security or result in significant adverse national or regional economic impacts (Section 506).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Limitations on Critical Habitat Designation: The Secretary may determine it is not prudent to designate critical habitat if the species is listed due to human activity and the designation would increase that activity, or if the species occurs in areas with negligible conservation value (Section 304).
-
Restrictions on Critical Habitat for Private Lands: The Secretary may be prohibited from designating critical habitat on privately owned or controlled land that is subject to certain land management plans (Section 304).
-
Changes to Judicial Review: The removal of a species from a list is not subject to judicial review during certain established periods (Section 303).
-
Increased Limits on Litigation Costs: The bill implements specific caps on the amount of attorney and expert witness fees that can be awarded in a single suit (Section 404).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+5Good For Farmers+4Good For Rural Residents+3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+6
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+5
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections-4
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Affordable Housing+1
- 4/20/2026
- Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1189 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4690, H. Res. 1182, H.R. 1897 and H.R. 5587. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4690, H. Res. 1182, H.R. 1897, and H.R. 5587 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 4690, H.R. 1897, and H.R. 5587.
- 3/24/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-568.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 489.
- 12/17/2025
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries Discharged
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 16.
- 9/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2025
- Subcommittee Hearings Held
- 3/18/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/14/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/6/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 15 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Mark AmodeiRepublican · Nevada
Cliff BentzRepublican · Oregon
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Nicholas BegichRepublican · Alaska
Ken CalvertRepublican · California
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Mike EzellRepublican · Mississippi
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Wesley HuntRepublican · Texas
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado
Robert LattaRepublican · Ohio
Doug LaMalfaRepublican · California
Celeste MaloyRepublican · Utah
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Dan NewhouseRepublican · Washington
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Thomas TiffanyRepublican · Wisconsin
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
Tim WalbergRepublican · Michigan