Bill · H.Con.Res. 89· House(119-HCONRES-89)
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- Introduced
- 4/23/2026
- Last activity
- 9/24/2026 — Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 244.
- Sponsored by
- Pramila Jayapal
- Cosponsors
- - 15 - 1
- Introduced
- Agreed to by the House
- Awaiting Senate
- Failed
A concurrent resolution is how the House and the Senate settle something they do together, such as a budget plan or a joint session. It is adopted once both chambers agree to it, and that puts it into effect; it is not a law, so it does not go to the President.
What this bill would do
This concurrent resolution directs the President to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran, its government, or its military. This includes removing potential ground forces in a combat role or those used for occupation. The removal is required unless Congress explicitly authorizes the action through a declaration of war or a specific authorization for the use of military force. However, the bill does not prevent the U.S. from defending itself, its armed forces, diplomatic facilities, or allies from imminent attack. It also does not prevent maintaining defensive troop presence or intelligence-sharing activities relating to Iran. Finally, the resolution explicitly states it does not authorize the use of military force.
Yes
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?+5
The resolution directs the de-escalation of active hostilities, which can reduce the immediate costs of active combat.
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?+5
Reducing active military hostilities is a step toward prioritizing diplomatic rather than military conflict resolution.
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+3
By focusing on defensive postures and intelligence sharing, the resolution supports stable relations with allies.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
What Congress actually voted on
2 recorded votes have been taken on this bill.
- The House: the vote on whether to adopt the resolutionPassed 214–208
A resolution is one chamber speaking for itself — setting its own rules, taking a position, honouring someone — and it never goes to the President. Agreeing to it is the whole decision.
07/23/2026 · Roll call 282 · recorded as “On Agreeing to the Resolution”
- The Senate: the vote on whether to adopt the resolutionConcurrent Resolution Rejected 49–50
A resolution is one chamber speaking for itself — setting its own rules, taking a position, honouring someone — and it never goes to the President. Agreeing to it is the whole decision.
09/24/2026 · Roll call 244 · recorded as “On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 1(a): This provision directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities against Iran unless Congress specifically authorizes it. This is a positive outcome for the people because it ensures our elected officials in Congress maintain their constitutional oversight and accountability regarding where our troops are sent to fight.
-
Section 1(b): This section ensures that the U.S. can still defend itself, its armed forces, diplomatic facilities, and allies from imminent attack. This is a positive for the people because it keeps our military personnel and nation protected if an actual attack is coming, without tying the hands of defenders.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Section 1(a): Depending on how the situation unfolds on the ground, limiting the President's ability to act without explicit congressional approval could potentially restrict swift tactical responses. While the text aims to curb unauthorized wars, critics might argue that such restrictions could impact the speed of military maneuvers.
-
Section 2: This section allows intelligence collection, analysis, and sharing with coalition partners to continue regarding threats from Iran. For individuals concerned about foreign entanglements or intelligence operations, the continuation of these activities means ongoing involvement in regional monitoring and partnerships.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Diplomatic Engagement+5Reduces Military Spending+5Improves International Alliances+3
- 9/24/2026
- Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged, under the order of 8/8/26.
- Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S4962-4969)
- Failed of passage/not agreed to in Senate: Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 244.
- Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 244.
- 7/23/2026
- Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 208 (Roll no. 282).
- On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 208 (Roll no. 282).
- Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5186)
- 7/22/2026
- POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Con. Res. 89, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the concurrent resolution and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jayapal demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
- DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Con. Res. 89.
- Considered pursuant to a previous order. (consideration: CR H5160-5165; text: CR H5160)
- Consideration initiated pursuant to a previous order.
- ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Mast asked unanimous consent that, it be in order at any time to consider H. Con. Res. 89 in the House if called up by the chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs or his designee; that the concurrent resolution be considered as read; and that the previous question be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution to adoption without intervening motion except for one hour of debate equally divided among and controlled by Representative Mast of Florida, Representative Meeks of New York, and Representative Jayapal of Washington, or their respective designees. Agreed to without objection.
- 16 Cosponsors added.
- 4/23/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
16 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- 119-HCONRES-40: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-75: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-86: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-87: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-88: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-91: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-92: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-93: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-94: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-95: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-99: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-100: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-101: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-102: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-104: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
- 119-HCONRES-105: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Jake AuchinclossDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jason CrowDemocrat · Colorado
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Chrissy HoulahanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Thomas MassieRepublican · Kentucky
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Patrick RyanDemocrat · New York
Robert ScottDemocrat · Virginia
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Derek TranDemocrat · California
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia