Aisha Wahab

What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

119-HR-6164

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 28201 Franklin Parkway in Santa Clarita, California, as the "Deputy Ryan Clinkunbroomer Post Office Building".

Introduced in the House · Nov 19

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Nov 19

This bill seeks to rename a specific United States Postal Service facility. The facility is located at 28201 Franklin Parkway in Santa Clarita, California.

Yes

• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+1The bill provides a formal designation for a government facility, which is an administrative action of government operation.

The opposite

• No question was scored the opposite.

119-HR-3565

To provide for a limitation on the transfer of defense articles and defense services to Israel.

Introduced in the House · May 21

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Foreign Affairs · May 21

This bill aims to place a limitation on the transfer of certain defense articles and services to Israel.

Yes· 2 of 3

• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+2The bill adds oversight requirements that mandate specific legal purposes for defense articles.
• Does this give the federal government more power?+1The bill requires the President to enforce specific conditions and legislative criteria before authorizing transfers.

The opposite· 2 of 3

• Does this send more money or help to other countries?-3The bill restricts the provision of certain defense articles and services to Israel, potentially reducing overall foreign military assistance.
• Does this reduce what is spent on the military?-2The bill imposes restrictions on the transfer of specific munitions, which may indirectly influence military aid flows.

119-HR-3069

Medicare for All Act

Introduced in the House · Apr 29

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Education and Workforce, Rules, Oversight and Government Reform, Armed Services, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Apr 29

This bill establishes a national Medicare-for-All health insurance program to provide comprehensive health coverage to United States residents.

Yes· 2 of 55

• Would children be better off under this?+10Provides automatic enrollment at birth and comprehensive pediatric coverage.
• Would people over 65 be better off under this?+10Expands Medicare to include comprehensive long-term care and removes cost-sharing.

The opposite· 2 of 7

• Does this lower what people pay for private health insurance?-10Bans private insurers from selling coverage that duplicates the act's benefits, effectively eliminating the primary private insurance market.
• Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-10Explicitly prohibits the use of program resources for law enforcement of registration requirements based on immigration, religion, or national origin.