The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
▶In committee30 billsIntroduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Oct 1
This resolution expresses support for designating the week of September 21 through September 27, 2026, as Rail Safety Week in the United States.
Yes
Does this repair or build roads and bridges?+2This resolution supports Rail Safety Week to promote safety awareness and reduce highway-rail grade crossing incidents.
Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?+2By encouraging education and awareness around railroad tracks and grade crossings, the resolution supports safer passenger rail operations.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Sep 16
This bill requires private health insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, and Federal Employees Health Benefits plans to cover annual glaucoma screenings for specified individuals without cost sharing.
Yes· 2 of 17
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+7The legislation expands access to annual glaucoma screenings across Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, and federal employee plans, and funds community grants for uninsured populations.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+6The bill ensures Medicare and other health plans cover annual glaucoma screenings for individuals aged 60 and older without cost sharing.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Sep 16
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Aug 31
This bill requires states to make all public high schools into voter registration agencies.
Yes· 2 of 7
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+8The bill specifically targets high school students to facilitate their registration and engagement in the democratic process.
Would students be better off under this?+8The bill directly empowers students by providing them with easier access to voter registration and election participation.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce · Aug 31
This bill seeks to amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Yes· 2 of 6
Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities?+5The bill enhances rights for students with disabilities by ensuring they receive formal recognition of their secondary education completion.
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+5The bill ensures students with disabilities receive a certificate of completion regardless of diploma eligibility.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Aug 31
This bill seeks to amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 and title 5 of the United States Code.
Yes· 2 of 7
Would children be better off under this?+5The bill facilitates parental involvement in children's educational and extracurricular activities.
Would people in middle age be better off under this?+3Provides work-life balance benefits for parents of school-aged children.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-2Imposes new administrative requirements and leave entitlements on employers.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce · Aug 3
This bill aims to provide grants to Historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs).
Yes· 2 of 6
Would Black Americans be better off under this?+9The bill specifically targets descendants of enslaved people, providing significant educational and financial benefits to this demographic.
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?+8The bill promotes racial equity by providing direct scholarship funding to descendants of enslaved persons attending HBCUs.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on the Judiciary · Jun 25
This bill aims to provide a pathway to permanent residence for certain Haitian nationals.
Yes· 2 of 5
Would immigrants be better off under this?+8The bill significantly benefits Haitian immigrants by providing a path to permanent residence and work authorization.
Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens?+7The bill provides a pathway for certain Haitian nationals to adjust their status to lawful permanent residence.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Apr 16
This bill proposes amendments to title 49 of the United States Code. It aims to change how certain grants for buses and bus-related equipment and facilities are used.
Yes· 2 of 5
Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?+4The bill increases the percentage of funds available for various bus-related equipment and facilities from 5 to 10 percent.
Would hourly workers be better off under this?+3The bill provides for workforce development and training within the transit sector.
The opposite
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?-3The bill strikes language specifically requiring funds to be used for zero emissions vehicles or related infrastructure.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Highways and Transit · Mar 25
This bill directs the Secretary of Transportation to establish a transit workforce center. The Secretary will award grants to a qualified nonprofit organization to carry out the Center's mission and duties.
Yes· 2 of 12
Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?+6The bill aims to make public transportation more efficient, safe, and reliable through workforce development.
Is this likely to create jobs?+5The bill supports the recruitment and hiring of skilled frontline public transportation workers through a new workforce center.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-1The bill requires the Secretary of Transportation to award grants to a nonprofit to establish and operate a new center.