Elissa Slotkin

What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

119-S-5554

Ovarian Cancer IMPACT Act

Introduced in the Senate · Sep 24

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions · Sep 24

This bill's text has not been analysed yet.

119-SRES-907

A resolution supporting the designation of September 2026 as "National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month".

Introduced in the Senate · Sep 24

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions · Sep 24

This resolution supports designating September 2026 as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month. It highlights that ovarian cancer is the fifth-leading cause of cancer deaths among women in the United States.

Yes· 2 of 8

• Would women be better off under this?+3The resolution focuses entirely on supporting National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month to improve outcomes, education, and address healthcare disparities for women.
• Would people over 65 be better off under this?+2Raising awareness of ovarian cancer can benefit older women, who are often at higher risk for gynecologic cancers.

The opposite

• No question was scored the opposite.

119-S-5345

A bill to provide for the delivery of artificial intelligence functional bills of materials, and for other purposes.

Introduced in the Senate · Aug 6

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Armed Services · Aug 6

This bill requires the Department of Defense to implement a system for receiving and maintaining artificial intelligence functional bills of materials.

Yes· 2 of 4

• Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+7The bill enhances national security by requiring detailed transparency of AI components to identify vulnerabilities and security risks.
• Does this require those who build or use AI to test it, disclose it or answer for what it does?+6The bill mandates that defense contractors disclose detailed AI functional bills of materials, including model lineage, training data, and hardware infrastructure.

The opposite

• Would business owners be better off under this?-4The bill imposes significant administrative burdens and potential implementation costs on defense contractors.
• Does this speed up building and using AI in the U.S.?-2The bill imposes significant new disclosure, documentation, and reporting requirements that may act as an administrative burden on AI procurement.

119-S-5344

A bill to require the Secretary of the Army to submit a report on efforts to support the production, testing, and sustainment of autonomous maneuver systems, components for such systems, and low-cost interceptors.

Introduced in the Senate · Aug 6

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Armed Services · Aug 6

This bill requires the Secretary of the Army to submit a formal report to the Senate and House Committees on Armed Services. The report must be submitted no later than April 15, 2027.

Yes· 2 of 6

• Is this likely to create jobs?+2The emphasis on expanding domestic supply chains and scaling production may stimulate job growth in the manufacturing sector.
• Does this speed up building and using AI in the U.S.?+1The bill requires a report on efforts to accelerate the production of autonomous maneuver systems and their components.

The opposite

• No question was scored the opposite.

119-S-5343

Military Leadership Removal Transparency Act of 2026

Introduced in the Senate · Aug 6

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Armed Services · Aug 6

This bill requires the Secretary of Defense to notify Congress when certain high-ranking officers leave their positions early.

119-S-5342

A bill to require a report on the advisability and feasibility of establishing a Drone Center of Excellence within the Army National Guard.

Introduced in the Senate · Aug 6

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Armed Services · Aug 6

This bill requires the Secretary of the Army to submit a report regarding the advisability and feasibility of creating a Drone Center of Excellence within the Army National Guard.

Yes

• Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+3The focus on artificial intelligence and drone warfare contributes to modernizing defense capabilities.
• Does this put more money into scientific research?+2The bill encourages experimentation with artificial intelligence and unmanned systems.

The opposite

• No question was scored the opposite.

119-S-5340

A bill to require a drone posture review.

Introduced in the Senate · Aug 6

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Armed Services · Aug 6

This bill requires the Secretary of Defense to conduct a drone posture review. This review covers uncrewed aerial, ground, surface, and undersea vehicles along with their enabling systems.

Yes

• Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+5The review of uncrewed systems directly enhances defensive capabilities against electronic and autonomous threats.
• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3The bill enhances transparency by requiring a report to be submitted to congressional defense committees.

The opposite

• No question was scored the opposite.

119-S-5009

MERIT Act of 2026

Introduced in the Senate · Jul 16

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Intelligence · Jul 16

The legislation focuses on the person serving as the Director of National Intelligence. It makes sure that anyone serving in this role in an acting capacity must have the required qualifications.

Yes· 2 of 3

• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+2Enhances accountability and standards for temporary high-ranking national security officials.
• Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+2Ensures qualified leadership with national security expertise for acting Directors of National Intelligence, which indirectly supports overall defense capabilities.

The opposite

• No question was scored the opposite.

119-S-4845

Protect Our Polls Act

Introduced in the Senate · Jun 18

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on the Judiciary · Jun 18

This bill is called the Protect Our Polls Act, and it sets up rules for sending troops or armed men to polling places.

Yes· 2 of 7

• Does this protect the right to vote?+7The bill increases oversight on the use of armed men at polling places and protects the suffrage rights of service members.
• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+6The bill requires detailed unclassified reports to be transmitted to Congressional leadership regarding troop deployments.

The opposite

• Does this give the federal government more power?-4The bill limits the executive branch's unilateral authority to deploy armed forces at polling places without congressional approval.

119-S-4710

Protecting America from Chinese Cars Act of 2026

Introduced in the Senate · Jun 9

Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Finance · Jun 9

This bill stops certain connected vehicles associated with foreign adversaries from entering or being transported into the United States.

Yes· 2 of 7

• Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+8The bill significantly enhances national security and cybersecurity by preventing connected vehicles linked to foreign adversaries from entering U.S. infrastructure.
• Does this give people more control over their personal data?+7By prohibiting connected vehicles from adversarial nations, the bill protects against foreign data exfiltration risks.

The opposite

• Is this likely to lower the prices of everyday things people buy?-3The bill imposes restrictions on the entry of certain vehicles, which may limit consumer choice and impact prices for those goods.
• Does this make trade with other countries easier?-3The bill restricts vehicle trade and imports originating from specific adversarial countries.

Showing the newest 10 — show all 30 →