Bill · S.Res. 565· Senate(119-SRES-565)
A resolution recognizing that facilities that produce renewable electricity are the cheapest power-generating facilities to operate and reliance on fossil fuel-generating facilities to meet growing power demand drives up wholesale electricity prices.
- Introduced
- 12/17/2025
- Last activity
- 12/17/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- Sponsored by
- Sheldon Whitehouse
- Cosponsors
- - 8 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution states that renewable electricity facilities are the cheapest power-generating facilities to operate. It notes that electricity prices depend on power demand and generation costs. The text points out that power demand in the United States is growing faster than at any point in the past two decades. It explains that power generators with the lowest operating costs are dispatched first to meet demand. As power demand increases, generators with higher operating costs are used, which drives up wholesale electricity prices. Finally, the resolution establishes that relying on fossil fuel-generating facilities to meet growing power demand drives up wholesale electricity prices.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?+3
The resolution promotes the economic and operational benefits of renewable energy sources over fossil fuels.
Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power?+3
Recognizes renewable electricity facilities as the cheapest power generators, favoring future renewable development.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+2
Lower electricity generation costs can help ease overall utility cost burdens for low-income consumers.
The opposite
Would union members be better off under this?-2
Fossils fuels are heavily reliant on union labor, and the resolution's criticism could negatively impact these workers.
Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced?-2
The resolution negatively characterizes fossil fuel-generating facilities as drivers of higher wholesale electricity prices.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Recognition of Lower Operating Costs: The resolution recognizes in Resolved (1) that renewable electricity facilities are the cheapest electricity-generating facilities to operate in order to meet power demand. This is beneficial because it points out the economic efficiency of renewable energy for the public.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Criticism of Fossil Fuels: The resolution states in Resolved (2) that relying on fossil fuel-generating facilities to meet growing power demand drives up wholesale electricity prices. This could be viewed as a negative burden for the fossil fuel industry and the workers who rely on coal, fossil gas, and oil, as it places blame on these sources for increasing costs.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+2Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Middle Class Households+2Good For Union Workers-2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Increases Renewable Energy Investment+3Reduces Carbon Emissions+3Reduces Fossil Fuel Production-2
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Inflation+2
- 12/17/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont