Bill · S.Res. 560· Senate(119-SRES-560)
A resolution recognizing that mercury pollution can cause severe health problems, including permanent brain damage, kidney damage, and birth defects.
- Introduced
- 12/17/2025
- Last activity
- 12/17/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Sponsored by
- Sheldon Whitehouse
- Cosponsors
- - 8 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution acknowledges that mercury pollution causes severe health problems like permanent brain damage, kidney damage, and birth defects. It notes that burning fossil fuels releases mercury into the air, which then enters the ground, water, and food system. The text points out that eating fish from mercury-contaminated water is the most common way people are exposed to dangerous levels. It highlights that fossil fuel-fired power plants are the largest source of mercury emissions in the country. Additionally, it mentions that millions of people, including many children, live near these power plants. Finally, it states the official sense of the Senate that the Environmental Protection Agency should not loosen controls on mercury pollution from power plants.
Yes· 3 of 15
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+5
The resolution expresses the sense of the Senate that the EPA should maintain strict controls on mercury pollution.
Would children be better off under this?+4
Protecting against heavy neurotoxins like mercury provides significant long-term health benefits for children and developing fetuses.
Would women be better off under this?+3
Particularly beneficial for pregnant women to prevent gestational mercury exposure and developmental issues in children.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-2
Maintaining strict environmental controls can impose compliance considerations on fossil fuel-fired power plant operators.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Protection from dangerous pollution: The resolution expresses the sense of the Senate that the Environmental Protection Agency should not loosen controls on mercury pollution from power plants, which can help protect people from a powerful neurotoxin. This is found in the resolving clause (2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts identified: Based strictly on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions that identify negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+4Good For People With Disabilities+3Good For Women+3Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Middle Aged+2Good For Seniors+2Good For Young Adults+2Good For African Americans+1Good For Hispanic Americans+1Good For Middle Class Households+1Good For Native Americans+1Good For Rural Residents+1Good For Urban Residents+1Good For Business Owners-2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+5
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+3
- 12/17/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont