Bill · S.Res. 133· Senate(119-SRES-133)
A resolution expressing support for the local public K-12 schools of the United States and condemning any actions that would defund public education or weaken or dismantle the Department of Education.
- Introduced
- 3/24/2025
- Last activity
- 3/24/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1805-1806)
- Sponsored by
- Adam Schiff
- Cosponsors
- - 19 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses strong support for local public K-12 schools and the students and families they serve. It affirms that the Department of Education plays a vital role in the United States public education system. The text argues that federal investment is essential for the success of public schools and should not be diverted to privately-run K-12 schools through vouchers. Furthermore, the resolution condemns actions that would dismantle or relocate major offices or the Department of Education itself. Finally, it opposes any actions that would reduce federal funding for public education or transfer those funding burdens to state and local governments.
Yes· 3 of 23
Would children be better off under this?+10
The resolution's focus on K-12 public education directly benefits children's development and opportunities.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+10
The resolution emphasizes funding specifically designed to serve low-income populations.
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+10
The resolution highlights specific, significant federal funding and legal protections for students with disabilities.
The opposite
Does this make it easier to use public money at a school other than the local one?-5
The resolution explicitly opposes the diversion of public funds to privately-run schools through vouchers.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-5
The resolution opposes transferring the funding burden for education from the Federal government to State and local governments.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Students with Disabilities: The Department of Education administers grants under the IDEA to help public schools serve more than 7,500,000 students with disabilities (Whereas clause). It also provides vocational rehabilitation services through Title I of the Rehabilitation Act of s1973 to help people with disabilities pursue post-secondary education, employment, and independent living (Whereas clause).
-
Support for Low-Income and Rural Communities: The Department of Education provides equitable supplementary funding through grants under part A of title I of the ESEA to more than 51,000 public schools serving populations of students from low-income families (Whereas clause). It also provides support to thousands of rural school districts through the Rural Education Achievement program (Whereas clause).
-
Support for Students Experiencing Homelessness: Funding is provided through subtitle B of title VII of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to support the identification, enrollment, attendance, and success of nearly 1,400,000 students experiencing homelessness (Whereas clause).
-
Support for English Language Learners: The Department of Education provides supplementary funding to help more than 5,000,000 English language learners achieve language proficiency and meet State academic standards (Whereas clause).
-
Teacher and School Leader Investment: Grants under part A of title II of the ESEA are used to invest in the quality and effectiveness of nearly 90 percent of teachers and approximately 20 percent of school leaders (Whereas clause).
-
Career and Technical Education: Funding is provided to strengthen and support career and technical education programs for more than 8,200,000 secondary students (Whereas clause).
-
Civil Rights Protections: The Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights enforces federal laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment (Whereas clause). It also provides protections from disability-based and sex-based discrimination for students and staff in education programs receiving federal financial assistance (Whereas clause).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Impact of Dismantling the Department of Education: Dismantling or relocating major offices within the Department of Education may substantially disrupt program administration and create a delay or loss of important funding for public schools (Whereas clause).
-
Impact of Reduced Federal Investment: Without Federal investment, State and local educational agencies would be forced to enact drastic funding cuts (Whereas clause). These cuts would disproportionately affect students from rural areas, low-income families, students of color, and students with disabilities (Whereas clause).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+10Good For Low Income Households+10Good For People With Disabilities+10Good For Rural Residents+10Good For Students+10Good For African Americans+5Good For Asian Americans+5Good For Hispanic Americans+5Good For Immigrants+5Good For Native Americans+5Good For Urban Residents+5Good For Women+5Good For Young Adults+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Disability Rights+10Improves Gender Equality+5Improves Poverty Reduction+5Improves Racial Equity+5Reduces Homelessness+5
- Education And Technology
- Increases Public School Funding+10Increases Scientific Research Funding+5Improves School Choice-5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+5
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+5Increase States Rights-5
- 4/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/27/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/24/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1805-1806)
- 18 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont