Bill · S.J.Res. 99· Senate(119-SJRES-99)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services relating to "Removal of the Automatic Extension of Employment Authorization Documents".
- Introduced
- 12/10/2025
- Last activity
- 4/29/2026 — Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 50. Record Vote Number: 111. (CR S2106)
- Sponsored by
- Jacky Rosen
- Cosponsors
- - 10 - 0
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to express congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. The rule in question is titled "Removal of the Automatic Extension of Employment Authorization Documents." If passed, the resolution would dictate that the rule has no force or effect. The resolution was introduced by Ms. Rosen and several other senators.
Yes· 3 of 5
Would immigrants be better off under this?+5
The bill prevents the removal of automatic extensions for employment authorization documents, which is vital for immigrant workers' stability.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+2
Maintaining work authorization provides greater economic stability for immigrant households.
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?+2
The preservation of employment document extensions provides stability for the significant Hispanic immigrant population.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-1
The resolution uses congressional authority to overturn a rule established by a federal agency.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
None of them settled the bill — every vote so far has been about whether to keep going.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Maintaining Employment Authorization: By disapproving the rule, the resolution aims to prevent the "Removal of the Automatic Extension of Employment Authorization Documents." This would prevent the change proposed by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services regarding how these documents are extended.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants+5Good For Hispanic Americans+2Good For Low Income Households+2
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power-1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Pathway To Citizenship+1
- 4/29/2026
- Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 50. Record Vote Number: 111. (CR S2106)
- 3/24/2026
- Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 366.
- 3/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/10/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 10 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts