Bill · S.J.Res. 81· Senate(119-SJRES-81)
A joint resolution terminating the national emergency declared to impose duties on articles imported from Brazil.
- Introduced
- 9/18/2025
- Last activity
- 10/31/2025 — Held at the desk.
- Sponsored by
- Timothy Kaine
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 1
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Awaiting House
What this bill would do
This is a joint resolution passed by the Senate on October 28, 2025. The resolution seeks to terminate a national emergency that was previously declared by the President. This specific emergency was declared on July 30, 2025, through Executive Order 14323. The purpose of that emergency was to impose duties on articles imported from Brazil. By passing this resolution, the national emergency is officially terminated pursuant to section 202 of the National Emergencies Act.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this make trade with other countries easier?+5
The resolution removes the import duties on articles from Brazil, thereby easing trade barriers.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+2
The removal of import duties may lead to lower prices on imported goods from Brazil.
Would middle-income households be better off under this?+2
The termination of duties may reduce the cost of imported goods for middle-income consumers.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
- The Senate: the vote on whether to pass the joint resolutionJoint Resolution Passed 52–48
A joint resolution is a bill by another name: it goes to the other chamber and then to the President. Most of them are used to overturn a rule an agency has made.
10/28/2025 · Roll call 594 · recorded as “On the Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 81”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Removal of Import Duties: By terminating the national emergency declared to impose duties on articles imported from Brazil, the duties imposed by Executive Order 14323 would no longer be in effect. This could benefit people by removing the costs associated with those specific duties.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Middle Class Households+2Good For Urban Residents+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Trade+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+1
- 10/31/2025
- Held at the desk.
- Received in the House.
- 10/30/2025
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- 10/28/2025
- Senate Committee on Finance discharged pursuant to the order of 10/07/2025.
- Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S7766-7779)
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 52 - 48. Record Vote Number: 594.
- Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 52 - 48. Record Vote Number: 594. (text: CR S7778-7779)
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/19/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/18/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Rand PaulRepublican · Kentucky
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia