Bill · S.J.Res. 75· Senate(119-SJRES-75)
A joint resolution terminating the emergency determined by the President on August 11, 2025, in the Executive Order titled "Declaring a crime emergency in the District of Columbia".
- Introduced
- 9/2/2025
- Last activity
- 9/2/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Chris Van Hollen
- Cosponsors
- - 13 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution terminates the emergency determined by the President on August 11, 2025, in the Executive Order titled "Declaring a crime emergency in the District of Columbia". It was introduced in the Senate on September 2, 2025, by Mr. Van Hollen and several co-sponsors. The text points out that the President failed to identify special emergency conditions that require using the Metropolitan Police Department for Federal purposes. It also notes that violent crime in the District of Columbia has declined for two years and is at a 30-year low. Additionally, the resolution mentions that the Federal Government prevented the District of Columbia from spending $1,000,000,000 of its own locally raised revenues budgeted for public safety and schools. The formal termination is enacted pursuant to section 740(b) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would people in cities be better off under this?+8
The resolution directly benefits residents of Washington, D.C. by ending federal takeover and restoring local police and budgetary control.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+7
The resolution respects local self-governance and autonomy for the District of Columbia by terminating federal emergency control.
Would children be better off under this?+5
Terminating the emergency order supports local control over budgeted funds that support public schools and youth services.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-5
The resolution rolls back federal intervention and executive overreach in local Washington, D.C. governance.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Ending the Presidential Crime Emergency: The core provision of the resolution terminates the emergency determined by the President on August 11, 2025, in the Executive Order titled "Declaring a crime emergency in the District of Columbia". This is positive because the text notes the President failed to identify special emergency conditions requiring the use of the Metropolitan Police Department for Federal purposes, and that violent crime has actually declined for the past two years to a 30-year low.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Negative Impacts Identified: Based strictly on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that create negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Urban Residents+8Good For Children+5Good For Students+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+7Increases Federal Power-5
- 9/11/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/2/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- 12 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts