Bill · S.J.Res. 207· Senate(119-SJRES-207)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards; Notice of Decision Granting a Waiver of Clean Air Act Preemption for California's Advanced Clean Car Program and a Within the Scope Conformation for California's Zero Emission Vehicle Amendments for 2017 and Earlier Model Years".
- Introduced
- 8/5/2026
- Last activity
- 8/5/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Sponsored by
- Pete Ricketts
- Cosponsors
- - 10 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution aims to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency. The rule involves the "California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards." It specifically concerns a decision to grant a waiver of Clean Air Act preemption for California's Advanced Clean Car Program. It also addresses a within the scope conformation for California's Zero Emission Vehicle Amendments for 2017 and earlier model years. If passed, the resolution dictates that this rule shall have no force or effect.
Yes
Does this give the federal government more power?+4
The resolution asserts federal disapproval of a state-specific EPA waiver, reinforcing federal oversight.
Would business owners be better off under this?+2
Automotive manufacturers may face lower compliance costs without California's strict ZEV mandates.
The opposite· 3 of 6
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-7
The bill explicitly removes California's authority to set its own unique vehicle emission standards.
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?-6
Disapproving the waiver for California's zero-emission vehicle program likely reduces the adoption of cleaner vehicles.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-6
The bill removes California's ability to enforce stricter vehicle pollution standards.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- There are no specific positive impacts or benefits for individuals or groups of people explicitly stated within the provided text.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no specific negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups of people explicitly stated within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections-6Reduces Carbon Emissions-6Increases Renewable Energy Investment-4Reduces Fossil Fuel Production-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+4Increase States Rights-7
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+2Good For Urban Residents-3
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/5/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming
Ted CruzRepublican · Texas
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
Jon HustedRepublican · Ohio
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
Bernie MorenoRepublican · Ohio
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Eric SchmittRepublican · Missouri