Bill · S.J.Res. 118· Senate(119-SJRES-118)
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
- Introduced
- 3/5/2026
- Last activity
- 3/18/2026 — Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 58.
- Sponsored by
- Cory Booker
- Cosponsors
- - 6 - 0
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This joint resolution directs the removal of United States Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran. It notes that Congress has the sole power to declare war and has not declared war upon Iran or enacted a specific statutory authorization for the use of military force there. The text points out that President Trump ordered air strikes inside Iran's territory on February 28, 2026, without congressional authorization or consultation. The bill requires the President to remove the armed forces from these hostilities unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or a specific authorization for use of military force. However, the resolution specifies that it does not prevent the United States from defending against attacks, sharing intelligence, or assisting Israel and partner countries in defending against retaliatory attacks or providing defensive material support.
Yes· 3 of 4
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?+5
The resolution directs the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities in Iran, which would reduce active combat expenditures.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+4
The bill enforces the War Powers Resolution, which requires presidential consultation with Congress regarding military hostilities.
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+3
The bill maintains support for the State of Israel and partner countries through intelligence sharing and defensive assistance.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-5
The bill seeks to limit unilateral presidential authority by reasserting congressional control over the declaration of war.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
None of them settled the bill — every vote so far has been about whether to keep going.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Reassertion of Congressional Authority: Section 1 notes that Congress has the sole power to declare war under the United States Constitution, and that Congress has not declared war upon Iran or enacted a specific statutory authorization for the use of military force within or against Iran. This holds the executive branch accountable by ensuring the collective judgment of both Congress and the President applies to the introduction of armed forces into hostilities.
-
Mandated Removal from Unauthorized Hostilities: Section 2(a) directs the President to remove the United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or a specific authorization for use of military force. This provision limits unauthorized military engagements that lack congressional approval.
-
Preservation of Defense and Alliance Support: Section 2(b) provides rules of construction ensuring that the resolution does not prevent the United States from defending against attacks on the United States, its personnel, or its facilities. It also allows the United States to continue collecting, analyzing, and sharing intelligence, and to assist Israel and partner countries in directly defending against retaliatory attacks or by providing defensive material support.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Potential Constraints on Ongoing Military Operations: Section 7 of the findings states that President Trump ordered the United States Armed Forces to conduct massive and ongoing air strikes inside Iran's territory without congressional authorization, and Section 2(a) directs the removal of armed forces from these hostilities. Depending on the operational reality, forcing the removal of armed forces from these specific hostilities could alter ongoing military campaigns initiated by the executive branch.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Reduces Military Spending+5Improves International Alliances+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Veterans+3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+4Increases Federal Power-5
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/18/2026
- Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 58.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/5/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
5 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- 119-SJRES-104: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
- 119-SJRES-114: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
- 119-SJRES-163: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
- 119-SJRES-183: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
- 119-SJRES-185: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California