Bill · S.J.Res. 116· Senate(119-SJRES-116)
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
- Introduced
- 3/5/2026
- Last activity
- 3/24/2026 — Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 69.
- Sponsored by
- Christopher Murphy
- Cosponsors
- - 9 - 0
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This joint resolution directs the President to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran. It notes that Congress has not declared war or provided specific statutory authorization for these actions. The resolution cites "Operation Epic Fury," which involved over 50,000 service members and has resulted in six deaths. The text highlights inconsistent timelines provided by the administration regarding the duration of these operations. Ultimately, the bill seeks to end military hostilities unless they are explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific statutory authority.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+6
The bill seeks to reduce the risk of life-threatening combat situations for service members currently engaged in the operation.
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?+5
The bill directs the removal of troops from ongoing hostilities, which reduces the immediate operational costs of the military campaign.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+5
Ending military hostilities in Iran would likely reduce the high costs of maintaining a large-scale military operation.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-5
The bill limits the unilateral power of the President to engage in hostilities without explicit Congressional authorization.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
None of them settled the bill — every vote so far has been about whether to keep going.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Service Members: By directing the removal of forces from unauthorized hostilities, the bill addresses concerns regarding the loss of life, noting that six members have already been killed and more are expected (Section 1, Finding 7).
-
Restoration of Constitutional Authority: The bill asserts that Congress has the sole power to declare war, aiming to ensure that military actions are subject to legislative authorization rather than unilateral presidential action (Section 1, Finding 1).
-
Clarification of Military Duration: The resolution responds to inconsistent timelines provided by the administration, which ranged from a few weeks to an unknown scope (Section 1, Finding 8).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Reduced Defensive Capabilities: The directive to remove forces could impact the ability of the United States to defend against attacks on its personnel or facilities in other nations (Section 2, subsection b, 1).
-
Limitations on Intelligence and Support: The removal of forces might limit the current scope of collecting, analyzing, or sharing intelligence related to threats from Iran or its proxies (Section 2, subsection b, 2).
-
Reduced Assistance to Partners: The directive could affect the ability of the United States to assist partner countries that have been attacked by Iran or its proxies in intercepting retaliatory attacks or receiving defensive materiel support (Section 2, subsection b, 3).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Reduces Military Spending+5Improves International Alliances+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Veterans+6
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power-5
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/16/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/24/2026
- Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 69.
- 3/20/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 3/5/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
6 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- 119-SJRES-104: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
- 119-SJRES-114: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
- 119-SJRES-115: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
- 119-SJRES-117: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
- 119-SJRES-163: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
- 119-SJRES-185: A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California