Bill · S.J.Res. 112· Senate(119-SJRES-112)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce relating to "One Year Suspension of Expansion of End-User Controls for Affiliates of Certain Listed Entities".
- Introduced
- 3/5/2026
- Last activity
- 4/30/2026 — Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 403.
- Sponsored by
- Elizabeth Warren
- Cosponsors
- - 10 - 0
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This is a joint resolution introduced in the 119th Congress. It aims to provide congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce. The rule in question is titled ``One Year Suspension of Expansion of End-User Controls for Affiliates of Certain Listed Entities''. If this resolution passes, the rule will have no force or effect.
Yes
Does this put more rules on large technology companies?+1
The resolution prevents a suspension of end-user controls, thereby maintaining existing regulatory oversight of technology exports.
Does this give the federal government more power?+1
The resolution upholds the Bureau of Industry and Security's authority to implement end-user controls by striking down the proposed suspension.
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+1
The resolution disapproves a suspension of end-user controls, which may help maintain stricter oversight of sensitive technology transfers.
The opposite
Does this make trade with other countries easier?-1
By disapproving a suspension of controls, the resolution maintains stricter trade restrictions on certain entities and their affiliates.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
The provided text does not contain information regarding the specific contents or effects of the Bureau of Industry and Security's rule itself. Therefore, I cannot identify specific benefits or positive outcomes that would result from the disapproval or the rule's implementation.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
The provided text does not contain information regarding the specific contents or effects of the Bureau of Industry and Security's rule itself. Therefore, I cannot identify specific burdens or negative consequences that would result from the disapproval or the rule's implementation.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Cybersecurity Defense+1Improves International Trade-1
- 4/30/2026
- Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 403.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon