Bill · S. 3646· Senate(119-S-3646)
No Political Enemies Act
- Introduced
- 1/14/2026
- Last activity
- 1/14/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Christopher Murphy
- Cosponsors
- - 10 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "No Political Enemies Act" aims to prevent the Federal Government from attacking individuals or organizations due to their political speech or participation. It prohibits covered Federal officials from initiating enforcement actions that are substantially motivated by protected speech or used to suppress dissent. The bill establishes an affirmative defense for people facing government claims and allows for civil actions to seek injunctions or damages. It also removes certain immunities for officials who act with political motivation. Finally, it requires the Department of Justice to provide regular reports to Congress regarding significant enforcement matters.
Yes· 3 of 8
Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?+8
The bill creates a legal mechanism to protect citizens from government actions motivated by their political speech.
Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life?+8
The bill provides legal protections and civil remedies to prevent the government from targeting individuals for their protected speech.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+6
The bill mandates quarterly reports from the Department of Justice to Congress regarding significant enforcement matters.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-2
The bill prohibits the obligation or expenditure of federal funds for certain enforcement claims, which may alter spending patterns.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Constitutional Rights: The bill prohibits covered Federal officials from taking government actions that are substantially motivated by protected speech or participation, which includes criticism or dissent (Section 4).
-
Legal Recourse Against Targeting: Individuals or domestic entities can bring civil actions to seek injunctions against government actions that cause harm (Section 6) or seek damages if an official knowingly directs an action motivated by protected speech (Section 7).
-
Easier Burden of Proof in Defense: If a person presents evidence that their speech was a motivating factor in a government claim, the government bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the action was based on legitimate, unrelated grounds (Section 5).
-
Financial Relief for Victims: The bill allows courts to order the United States to pay reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to parties who prevail in proceedings related to these types of government actions (Section 8).
-
Prevention of Tax-Related Targeting: A Federal court may issue an injunction to restrain the assessment or collection of a tax if the action to deny or investigate tax-exempt status is motivated by protected speech (Section 6).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Limitations on Federal Official Immunity: The bill reduces the immunity of covered Federal officials, allowing them to be sued for damages unless they acted in good faith and the speech involved was not protected (Section 7).
-
Restrictions on Government Funding: The bill prohibits the obligation or expenditure of Federal funds for government actions or enforcement claims that are substantially motivated by protected speech or participation (Section 9).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Freedom Of Speech+8Improves Government Transparency+6Improves Privacy Rights+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Freedom Of Speech+8Improves Policing Reform+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+4Good For Middle Class Households+4Good For People With Disabilities+3
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending-2
- 1/14/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 10 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont