Bill · S. 3226· Senate(119-S-3226)
Bring Our Heroes Home Act
- Introduced
- 11/19/2025
- Last activity
- 8/6/2026 — Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- Sponsored by
- Mike Crapo
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 10
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Bring Our Heroes Home Act" establishes a Missing Armed Forces and Civilian Personnel Records Collection at the National Archives. It creates an independent Review Board to facilitate the identification, transmission, and public disclosure of records regarding missing personnel from December 7, 1941, to the date of enactment. Government offices are required to locate, review, and transmit these records to the Archivist for public access. While the Act presumes declassification, it allows for the postponement of disclosure under specific national security or privacy conditions. The Review Board provides oversight to ensure the fullest possible accounting for the missing.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+8
The bill mandates the identification and public disclosure of previously classified missing personnel records.
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+7
The act provides families and veterans a systematic way to seek the truth regarding missing service members.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+5
The bill provides accountability and historical clarity for missing personnel, which benefits veterans and their families.
The opposite
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?-3
The bill includes provisions that may override some privacy protections to facilitate the release of historical records.
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?-2
The mandate for transparency could create friction with foreign governments regarding sensitive historical records.
Does this shorten or soften prison sentences?-1
The bill focuses on record disclosure rather than criminal justice or sentencing reform.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency for Families: The Act seeks to provide families of missing individuals with the fullest possible accounting regarding the fate of their loved ones through the public disclosure of records (Section 2(a)(1), Section 2(b)(2)).
-
Creation of a Centralized Historical Resource: A new "Missing Armed Forces and Civilian Personnel Records Collection" will be established at the National Archives to preserve records for historical and governmental purposes and public research (Section 2(a)(1), Section 4(a)(1)).
-
Accountability for Government Offices: Government offices must conduct thorough searches and submit certifications under penalty of perjury to ensure all relevant records are identified and transmitted (Section 5(a)(1), Section 5(a)(2)).
-
Mechanism to Challenge Withheld Information: The Review Board has the authority to direct government offices to transmit records and can review decisions where a government office proposes to withhold or substantially redact information (Section 5(a)(5), Section 7(j)).
-
Efforts to Unseal Important Records: The Act allows the Review Board to request that the Attorney General petition courts to release information held under seal or under grand jury secrecy that is relevant to the fate of missing personnel (Section 10(a)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Risk to National Security: The Act allows for the postponement of disclosure if the information pertains to sensitive areas such as military plans, weapons systems, intelligence activities, or nuclear security (Section 6(a)(1)).
-
Potential Impact on Foreign Relations: Disclosure could be postponed if it is expected to cause serious harm to relations between the United States and foreign governments (Section 6(b)(1)(D)).
-
Privacy and Safety Concerns: Information may be withheld if its disclosure would reveal the identity of a confidential human source and pose a substantial risk of harm, or if it constitutes an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy (Section 6(c)(1), Section 6(c)(2)).
-
Operational Risks to Personnel: Disclosure could be postponed if it is expected to cause harm to methods used by members of the Armed Forces to survive, evade, resist, or escape (Section 6(c)(3)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Veterans+7
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+8Improves Privacy Rights-3
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+5Improves International Alliances-2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Criminal Sentencing Reform-1
- 8/6/2026
- Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- 7/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/19/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia