Bill · S. 3062· Senate(119-S-3062)
GUARD Act
- Introduced
- 10/28/2025
- Last activity
- 5/11/2026 — Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 406.
- Sponsored by
- Josh Hawley
- Cosponsors
- - 6 - 14
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the GUARD Act, sets new rules for artificial intelligence chatbots and AI companions. It requires companies that make AI chatbots available to the public to use age verification processes for certain services. The legislation bans minors from accessing AI companions that simulate sustained relationships or emotional interactions. It also establishes criminal penalties for chatbots that promote sexually explicit content or physical violence involving minors. Additionally, the bill mandates that chatbots clearly disclose to users that they are artificial intelligence systems and not human beings or licensed professionals. Finally, it gives enforcement powers to the Attorney General and State attorneys general.
Yes· 3 of 7
Does this put more rules on large technology companies?+8
The legislation imposes significant compliance requirements, age verification mandates, and criminal penalties on AI chatbot providers.
Would children be better off under this?+8
The bill protects minors from harmful content, sexual solicitation, and psychological risks associated with AI companions.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+6
The bill enhances consumer protection by requiring AI chatbots to disclose non-human and non-professional status.
The opposite
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?-4
Individuals under 18 years old are completely prohibited from accessing and using AI companion applications.
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
Covered entities face potential financial and administrative burdens from implementing mandatory age verification and compliance protocols.
Would students be better off under this?-3
Minors and students under 18 are blocked from interacting with AI companions.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection Against Harmful Content: Section 4 makes it a criminal offense to make publicly available an AI chatbot that solicits, induces, or coerces minors to commit suicide, non-suicidal self-injury, physical violence, homicide, or engages them in sexually explicit conduct. This provides clear legal safeguards to protect children from dangerous and traumatic online interactions.
-
Enhanced User Transparency: Section 5(c) requires artificial intelligence chatbots to clearly and conspicuously disclose at the initiation of each conversation that the chatbot is an artificial intelligence system and not a human being. It also prohibits chatbots from pretending to be licensed professionals like therapists, physicians, lawyers, or financial advisors, ensuring users are not deceived about who or what is providing them information.
-
Data Security for Age Verification: Section 5(b)(5) requires covered entities to maintain reasonable data security, limit the collection of personal data to what is minimally necessary for verifying a user's adult status, protect data with industry-standard encryption, retain it only as long as necessary, and prohibit sharing or selling that data. This protects the personal information of individuals undergoing age checks.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Access Restrictions for Minors: Section 6 completely prohibits minors from accessing or using any AI companion made publicly available by a covered entity. This means individuals under 18 years of age are entirely cut off from utilizing these specific types of AI software applications.
-
Burdensome Verification Requirements for Adults: Section 5(b) requires adults to undergo a reasonable age verification process—which may involve submitting a verified form of identification or financial account information—to restore frozen accounts or create new accounts for accessing AI companions. This creates an administrative hurdle and potential privacy friction for adult users who simply want to use the technology.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation+8Improves Data Privacy+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Privacy Rights+5Increases Federal Power+4Increase States Rights+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+6
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+8Good For Young Adults-4Good For Business Owners-3Good For Students-3
- 6/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/11/2026
- Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 406.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2026
- Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- 4/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/28/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia