Bill · S. 2763· Senate(119-S-2763)
Keep Billionaires Out of Social Security Act
- Introduced
- 9/10/2025
- Last activity
- 9/10/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- Sponsored by
- Bernie Sanders
- Cosponsors
- 1 - 29
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This legislation, titled the Keep Billionaires Out of Social Security Act, aims to protect and fund the operations of the Social Security Administration. It blocks the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and specific executive orders from having jurisdiction over Social Security programs and personnel. The bill prohibits political appointees from accessing private beneficiary data systems without specific research responsibilities. It prevents the closure of Social Security field and hearing offices, while maintaining staffing levels. Additionally, the legislation provides permanent funding for administrative expenses and appropriates extra money to improve customer service and reduce claims backlogs.
Yes· 3 of 29
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+9
Strongly protects senior citizens' retirement benefits, maintains field offices, and caps overpayment recoupment rates.
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+9
Provides extensive legal assistance grants, protects disability benefits, and enhances accessibility.
Would retired people be better off under this?+9
Safeguards retirement benefits, improves customer service, and prevents office closures.
The opposite
Would billionaires be better off under this?-2
Explicitly blocks external efficiency task forces like DOGE from interfering with Social Security operations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection from Outside Interference: Section 2 ensures that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has no authority or jurisdiction over the Social Security Administration, its personnel, systems, or benefits. This protects everyday Americans by keeping outside entities from disrupting their benefits and operating systems.
-
Better Customer Service and Maintained Offices: Section 6 mandates that the Social Security Administration maintain at least the same number of field offices, hearing offices, and resident stations that existed on January 1, 2025. It also requires the agency to improve telephone wait times, maintain live operator assistance, and protect staffing levels from hiring freezes.
-
Increased Funding for Backlogs and IT: Section 9 appropriates $2,000,000,000 for fiscal years 2026 through 2035 to reduce initial disability claims backlogs, increase awareness of Supplemental Security Income for families with disabled children, and modernize information technology capabilities.
-
Capping Overpayment Deductions: Section 10 amends how overpayments are recovered by limiting monthly benefit decreases to the greater of 10 percent of the monthly benefit or $10, protecting beneficiaries from losing large portions of their monthly income due to administrative errors.
-
Legal Assistance Grants: Sections 11 and 12 provide grants to state protection and advocacy systems and community-based organizations to help individuals with disabilities navigate the application and appeals processes for Social Security benefits.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Strict Privacy Penalties that Could Burden Administration: Section 3 imposes severe civil and criminal penalties for unauthorized access or disclosure of beneficiary data systems by federal employees. While meant to protect privacy, if an employee makes a good faith or erroneous interpretation of the rules, it could create legal complications, though exceptions are provided for good-faith errors under Section 3(i)(2)(A).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For People With Disabilities+9Good For Retirees+9Good For Seniors+9Good For Low Income Households+8Good For Middle Class Households+6Good For Middle Aged+5Good For Children+4Good For Rural Residents+4Good For Urban Residents+4Good For African Americans+3Good For Asian Americans+3Good For Hispanic Americans+3Good For Native Americans+3Good For Union Workers+3Good For Veterans+3Good For Young Adults+3Good For Billionaires-2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Social Security+9Improves Disability Rights+7Improves Poverty Reduction+5Improves Racial Equity+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Privacy Rights+8Improves Due Process+6Improves Government Transparency+4Increases Federal Power+2
- Education And Technology
- Improves Data Privacy+8Improves Internet Access+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Fiscal Responsibility+3Increases Job Creation+2
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Cybersecurity Defense+2
- 9/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/10/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- 29 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts