Bill · S. 242· Senate(119-S-242)
Dignity for Aborted Children Act
- Introduced
- 1/24/2025
- Last activity
- 1/24/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- Sponsored by
- Pete Ricketts
- Cosponsors
- - 12 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Dignity for Aborted Children Act aims to regulate the disposal of human fetal tissue following an abortion procedure. It requires abortion providers to offer patients specific options for the tissue, such as taking possession for interment or cremation or releasing it to the provider. If the provider receives the tissue, they must ensure its final disposition through interment or cremation within seven days. The bill establishes civil and criminal penalties for providers who fail to follow these documentation and disposal requirements. Additionally, it mandates annual reporting from both providers and the Secretary to Congress regarding abortion numbers and disposal methods.
Yes
Does this give the federal government more power?+4
The bill expands federal oversight of abortion providers through mandatory reporting and specific disposal mandates.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3
The bill requires annual reporting of abortion data to the Secretary and Congress.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Does this make abortion easier to get?-5
The bill imposes strict disposal timelines and administrative requirements that may create barriers to abortion services.
Would business owners be better off under this?-4
The bill subjects medical providers to criminal penalties and civil fines up to $50,000 for documentation errors.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?-3
The bill imposes significant new administrative costs and potential criminal/civil penalties on providers.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Patient Choice in Disposal: Patients are provided with specific options regarding the fate of human fetal tissue, including the ability to take possession of it for interment or cremation services (Section 3(a)(1)(A)).
-
Protection Against Prosecution: The bill includes a provision that protects patients from being prosecuted based on a provider's violation of the disposal requirements (Section 3(c)(3)).
-
Standardized Disposal: Providers who receive tissue are required to ensure it is handled through interment or cremation in accordance with State law, ensuring a specific method of final disposition (Section 3(b)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Financial Penalties for Providers: Abortion providers may face civil monetary penalties of up to $50,000 if they fail to maintain the required documentation (Section 3(c)(1)).
-
Criminal Penalties for Providers: Providers who fail to meet the seven-day deadline for the final disposition of tissue via interment or cremation may face fines and imprisonment of up to 5 years (Section 3(b) and Section 3(c)(2)).
-
Increased Administrative Burdens: Providers are required to obtain signatures on consent forms, retain those forms in patient files, and submit annual reports containing aggregate data on procedures and gestational ages (Section 3(a)(2) and Section 3(d)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+4Improves Government Transparency+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners-4Good For Women-2
- Healthcare
- Improves Abortion Access-5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support-3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gender Equality-2
- 8/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/24/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- 11 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Josh HawleyRepublican · Missouri
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Eric SchmittRepublican · Missouri
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi