Bill · S. 2390· Senate(119-S-2390)
Unlocking Housing Supply Through Streamlined and Modernized Reviews Act
- Introduced
- 7/23/2025
- Last activity
- 7/23/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Sponsored by
- Mike Rounds
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 3
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The bill, titled the "Unlocking Housing Supply Through Streamlined and Modernized Reviews Act," aims to expedite housing-related activities by directing the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to reclassify the application of certain requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). This involves adjusting administrative regulations to categorize various housing activities under existing exemption and exclusion rules. The goal is to reduce review times and administrative costs, particularly in the affordable housing sector.
Yes· 3 of 31
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+8
The bill is explicitly focused on streamlining affordable housing, directly benefiting low-income households.
Does this make housing cost less?+7
The bill directly targets increasing affordable housing by streamlining project reviews.
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+5
The bill addresses housing affordability, which is a major concern for young adults.
The opposite
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-3
Streamlining NEPA requirements may lead to reduced environmental oversight.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
The reclassification of housing-related activities, as described in Section 3, could lead to faster approval and implementation of projects such as tenant-based rental assistance (Section 3(a)(1)(A)), supportive services (Section 3(a)(1)(B)), and economic development activities (Section 3(a)(1)(D)). This can provide quicker access to housing and related services for individuals and families.
-
Streamlining the process for activities like rehabilitation of 1-to-4 unit residential buildings (Section 3(a)(2)(B)) and new construction on scattered sites (Section 3(a)(2)(C)) could increase the availability of affordable housing options.
-
The inclusion of infill projects (Section 3(a)(3)(F)) and conversion of existing office buildings into residential development (Section 3(a)(3)(B)) under streamlined regulations may encourage the development of housing in already established areas.
-
The buyout provision (Section 3(a)(3)(G)) for properties in high-risk areas impacted by disasters may help residents relocate to safer locations.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
The streamlining of NEPA requirements may reduce environmental review and oversight for certain housing projects, potentially leading to negative environmental impacts on communities (Section 3).
-
The reclassification of activities could lead to less public input and community involvement in housing development decisions.
-
The increased speed of project approvals might result in overlooking potential negative consequences for existing residents, like increased traffic or strain on local resources.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+8Good For Young Adults+5Good For Middle Class Households+4Good For People With Disabilities+4Good For Seniors+4Good For Urban Residents+4Good For African Americans+3Good For Hispanic Americans+3Good For Immigrants+3Good For Middle Aged+3Good For Retirees+3Good For Students+3Good For Asian Americans+2Good For Business Owners+2Good For Children+2Good For L G B T Q Community+2Good For Men+2Good For Native Americans+2Good For Union Workers+2Good For Veterans+2Good For White Americans+2Good For Women+2Good For Rural Residents+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Affordable Housing+7Reduces Homelessness+4Improves Poverty Reduction+3
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+3Improves Economic Growth+2Improves Small Business Support+2Reduces Government Spending+2Improves Fiscal Responsibility+1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections-3
- 2/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/31/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/23/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey