Bill · S. 2368· Senate(119-S-2368)
Defending American Property Abroad Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 7/21/2025
- Last activity
- 7/21/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- Sponsored by
- Bill Hagerty
- Cosponsors
- - 10 - 2
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Defending American Property Abroad Act of 2025 seeks to protect United States persons from foreign governments that nationalize or expropriate their property. The bill directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify "prohibited property," which includes specific ports or marine terminals in countries with free trade agreements with the U.S. that have seized land owned by U.S. persons. Once designated, the President will prohibit vessels from those locations from importing goods, docking passenger vessels, or performing maintenance in the United States. Additionally, the bill amends the Trade Act of 1974 to include the expropriation of assets as an unreasonable or discriminatory practice.
Yes· 3 of 5
Would business owners be better off under this?+5
The bill provides protections against the nationalization and expropriation of business assets by foreign governments.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+5
The bill expands the definition of unreasonable trade practices to include the denial of due process regarding United States assets.
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?+4
The bill provides specific protections for United States persons against the seizure of their large-scale land or contract assets.
The opposite
Does this make trade with other countries easier?-3
The bill introduces new trade prohibitions and restrictions on vessels from specific designated ports.
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?-2
The bill could strain relations with trade partners in the Western Hemisphere through unilateral trade prohibitions.
Is this likely to grow the economy?-2
The bill may decrease trade efficiency by imposing prohibitions on certain vessels and goods.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Property Rights: The bill targets foreign governments that have nationalized, forcibly limited, or expropriated land or contracts belonging to United States persons (Section 2(a)(4)).
-
Expanded Legal Protections: By amending the Trade Act of 1974, the bill expands what is considered an unreasonable or discriminatory act to include the direct or indirect expropriation or nationalization of assets belonging to a United States person (Section 3).
-
Defense Against Unfair Treatment: The bill adds protections against arbitrary or capricious treatment, denial of due process, or discrimination based on nationality regarding the assets of a United States person (Section 3).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on Trade and Travel: The President would be required to prohibit vessels from designated prohibited property from importing goods, releasing goods, docking passenger vessels, or releasing passengers into the United States (Section 2(c)).
-
Limitations on Vessel Services: Vessels associated with prohibited property would be prohibited from performing dry docking, repairs, refurbishing, refueling, or other maintenance-related activities in the United States (Section 2(c)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+5Good For High Net Worth Individuals+4
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+5Increases Federal Power+4
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Trade-3Improves International Alliances-2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+3Improves Economic Growth-2
- 4/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/22/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Markwayne MullinRepublican · Oklahoma
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi