Bill · S. 2070· Senate(119-S-2070)
Insurrection Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 6/12/2025
- Last activity
- 6/12/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
- Sponsored by
- Richard Blumenthal
- Cosponsors
- - 23 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Insurrection Act of 2025 aims to provide the President with limited authority to use the military to stop insurrections, rebellions, or widespread domestic violence. Use of the armed forces is intended to be a last resort, occurring only when state and local authorities are overwhelmed or unable to enforce the law. The bill establishes specific triggering circumstances, such as when constitutional rights, like voting, are obstructed. To ensure accountability, the President must consult with Congress, issue a formal proclamation, and submit detailed reports. Additionally, any deployed forces must operate under specific rules for the use of force and are subject to congressional approval through joint resolutions.
Yes· 3 of 4
Does this give the federal government more power?+6
The bill expands the President's authority to deploy military forces domestically under specific conditions.
Does this protect the right to vote?+5
The bill specifically protects the enforcement of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 during times of insurrection.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+4
The bill mandates detailed reporting to Congress and a formal proclamation process.
The opposite
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-4
The bill allows federal military intervention even if state and local authorities are deemed insufficient.
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-3
Increased military presence for domestic violence and insurrection could lead to heightened surveillance of citizens.
Does this change how police departments operate?-2
The bill expands federal military authority for domestic law enforcement, which may impact policing standards.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Constitutional Rights: The bill addresses the obstruction of laws that deprive people of rights, privileges, or protections named in the Constitution, specifically including the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (Sec. 252(a)(3)(A)).
-
Last Resort Policy: By establishing that military deployment should only happen if State, local, and Federal civilian law enforcement are unable to handle a situation, the bill aims to prevent unnecessary military presence (Sec. 251).
-
Judicial Oversight: Individuals or entities who fear injury from the use of the armed forces have the right to bring civil actions for relief in court (Sec. 257(a)).
-
Requirement for Accountability: The President is required to provide a written report detailing the mission's scope, duration, and the necessity of the deployment, ensuring the public and Congress have information on the action (Sec. 254(c)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Limited Duration of Authority: While intended as a safeguard, the authority granted by the President automatically terminates after 7 days unless Congress acts, which could lead to sudden gaps in law enforcement during an ongoing crisis (Sec. 255(a)(1)).
-
Potential for Federal Intervention: The bill allows for the use of the armed forces to enforce Federal law if state authorities are deemed insufficient, which could result in increased federal military presence in a State (Sec. 252(a)(3)(B)).
-
Constraints on National Guard: Members of the National Guard performing specific training or duties under title 32 cannot be used for these domestic purposes (Sec. 259).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+6Improves Government Transparency+4Improves Due Process+3Increase States Rights-4
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Increases Domestic Surveillance-3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Voting Rights+5Improves Policing Reform-2
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/17/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/12/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
- 19 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts