Bill · S. 197· Senate(119-S-197)
Protecting Military Installations and Ranges Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 1/22/2025
- Last activity
- 1/22/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Ted Cruz
- Cosponsors
- - 8 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Protecting Military Installations and Ranges Act of 2025 requires the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to review real estate transactions involving specific foreign entities. This applies to the purchase or lease of property near military installations, training routes, airspace, or firing areas. The targeting of these reviews includes foreign persons connected to or subsidized by the Russian Federation, the People's Republic of China, the Islamic Republic of Iran, or the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Additionally, the bill mandates that the Committee initiate these reviews unilaterally. It also establishes specific rules regarding the review of energy projects that involve real property under investigation by the Committee.
Yes· 3 of 4
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+2
The bill mandates specific certifications be sent to Members of Congress regarding sensitive land transactions.
Would people in cities be better off under this?+1
Increased oversight of land near military areas may protect the security of local communities surrounding those installations.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+1
The bill increases scrutiny on foreign land acquisitions which could prevent unfair market dominance near military sites.
The opposite
Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?-2
The bill may delay energy infrastructure projects that require Secretary of Transportation determinations due to required CFIUS reviews.
Would business owners be better off under this?-2
The bill introduces new regulatory hurdles and potential delays for energy project developers and real estate investors.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Oversight of Sensitive Areas: The bill requires the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to review the purchase or lease of real estate located within 100 miles of a military installation or 50 miles of certain military airspace and training routes (Section 2(a)(1)(B)(vi)). This could provide better scrutiny of land acquisitions near military assets.
-
Targeted Security Measures: The review process specifically targets foreign persons who are owned, controlled, or receive subsidies from the governments of the Russian Federation, the People's Republic of China, the Islamic Republic of Iran, or the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (Section 2(a)(1)(B)(vi)(II)).
-
Mandatory Security Reviews: The bill requires the Committee to unilaterally initiate reviews for these specific covered transactions (Section 2(b)(1)(ii)).
-
Enhanced Communication with Officials: The bill requires certifications regarding these transactions to be sent to specific Members of the Senate and House of Representatives based on the location of the military installations or areas involved (Section 2(c)(3)).
-
National Security Protection for Energy Projects: If the Committee determines a real property transaction threatens national security, the Secretary of Defense must find that the energy project results in an unacceptable risk (Section 3(a)(2)(B)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Project Delays: The Secretary of Defense may not complete the review of an energy project until the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States concludes its action regarding the real property involved (Section 3(a)(1)(A)).
-
Restrictions on Transportation Determinations: The Secretary of Transportation is prohibited from issuing determinations regarding proposed structures on certain real property until the Committee concludes its action and specific findings are made by the Secretary of Defense (Section 3(a)(2)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Public Transit-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Urban Residents+1Good For Business Owners-2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+1
- 3/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/22/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Markwayne MullinRepublican · Oklahoma
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama