Bill · S. 1881· Senate(119-S-1881)
Public Service Worker Protection Act
- Introduced
- 5/22/2025
- Last activity
- 5/22/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- Sponsored by
- Edward Markey
- Cosponsors
- - 13 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Public Service Worker Protection Act," aims to amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. The primary purpose is to expand coverage under that Act to include public employees. This expansion would include the United States, a State, or a political subdivision of a State. The changes would take effect 90 days after enactment, with a specific exception for certain states and political subdivisions.
Yes
Does this give the federal government more power?+7
This bill expands federal oversight of workplace safety by including state and local government employees under OSHA jurisdiction.
Would union members be better off under this?+6
Public service workers receive enhanced federal safety protections through expanded OSHA coverage.
Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?+5
Expanding OSHA coverage provides enhanced safety protections and workplace rights for public employees.
The opposite
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-3
The bill reduces the autonomy of states by mandating federal OSHA coverage for public employees.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Expanded Protections for Public Workers: By amending Section 3(5) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, the bill expands coverage to include the United States, a State, or a political subdivision of a State (Section 2(a)). This would provide public employees with the protections offered under the Act.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Delayed Coverage for Certain Public Workers: For workplaces of a State or a political subdivision of a State that does not have an approved State plan, the coverage would not take effect until 36 months after the date of enactment (Section 2(c)(2)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Union Workers+6
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Union Protections+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+7Increase States Rights-3
- 3/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/22/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- 10 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts