Bill · S. 1296· Senate(119-S-1296)
DETERRENT Act
- Introduced
- 4/3/2025
- Last activity
- 4/3/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- Sponsored by
- Thomas Tillis
- Cosponsors
- - 23 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The DETERRENT Act seeks to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to increase transparency regarding foreign financial ties to colleges and universities. It strengthens disclosure requirements for gifts and contracts received from foreign sources. The bill prohibits institutions of higher education from entering into contracts with specific foreign countries or entities of concern, subject to a strict waiver process. Additionally, it requires institutions to implement policies and databases to track financial disclosures from faculty and staff. The Act also establishes strict enforcement mechanisms, including significant fines and civil actions for non-compliance.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+7
The bill mandates a public, searchable database for foreign gifts and contracts, greatly increasing institutional transparency.
Does this give the federal government more power?+5
The bill significantly increases federal oversight and enforcement authority over higher education institutions regarding foreign ties.
The opposite
Does this make college cost less?-2
The administrative burdens and potential loss of federal funding may negatively impact college affordability and institutional stability.
Does this put more money into scientific research?-1
Strict disclosure and contract prohibitions could restrict the flow of foreign funds vital for research.
Would students be better off under this?-1
The restrictions on foreign funding and increased compliance costs could indirectly impact student opportunities and institutional resources.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency for the Public: The bill requires the Secretary to establish and maintain a searchable, public database containing disclosure reports regarding foreign gifts and contracts. (Section 2(d)(1))
-
Enhanced Information Sharing for National Security: The Secretary is required to transmit unredacted disclosure reports to several high-level agencies, including the FBI, CIA, and Department of Defense, to facilitate information sharing. (Section 2(e))
-
Standardized Institutional Policies: The Act mandates that institutions maintain specific policies and databases to identify and manage potential information gathering by foreign sources through espionage. (Section s 3(a)(1))
-
Accountability for Higher Education Institutions: The bill provides for investigations and civil actions by the Attorney General to ensure institutions comply with new disclosure and contract requirements. (Section 4(a)(1))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Burden on Institutions via Increased Requirements: Institutions are required to maintain complex internal policies, designate compliance officers, and maintain specific databases for both the institution and their faculty/staff. (Section 3(a)(1))
-
Financial Penalties for Non-Compliance: Institutions face significant fines for violating reporting requirements, with some fines reaching up to 20 percent of their total Federal funds received under the Act. (Section 4(a)(4))
-
Restrictions on Contracts: Institutions are prohibited from entering into contracts with certain foreign countries or entities of concern, which may impact their ability to operate or partner with those entities unless a waiver is granted. (Section 2(b))
-
Potential Loss of Federal Funding: Institutions that are subject to multiple civil actions and fail to comply with requirements may be rendered ineligible to participate in federal programs for a period of not less than two institutional fiscal years. (Section 4(b)(2))
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+7Increases Federal Power+5
- Education And Technology
- Improves College Affordability-2Increases Scientific Research Funding-1
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Students-1
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/3/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- 11 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Bill CassidyRepublican · Louisiana
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Joni ErnstRepublican · Iowa
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Chuck GrassleyRepublican · Iowa
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Eric SchmittRepublican · Missouri
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama