RepublicanBill · H.Res. 932· House(119-HRES-932)

Denouncing dangerous and seditious rhetoric by Members of Congress and expressing condemnation of Senator Mark Kelly, Senator Elissa Slotkin, Representative Jason Crow, Representative Christopher Deluzio, Representative Maggie Goodlander, and Representative Chrissy Houlahan for attempting to sow disallegiance amongst members of the United States military and intelligence community and encouraging them to act against the Commander in Chief and President of the United States and violate the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Rep. Zinke
Age: 65 years
Montana
Introduced
12/4/2025
Last activity
12/4/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by
Ryan Zinke
Cosponsors
Republican - 30Democrat - 0
Congress
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This resolution denounces specific Members of Congress for what it describes as dangerous and seditious rhetoric. The resolution expresses condemnation of Senator Mark Kelly, Senator Elissa Slotkin, and Representatives Jason Crow, Christopher Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander, and Chrissy Houlahan. It accuses these individuals of attempting to sow disallegiance within the military and intelligence communities. The text alleges these members encouraged service members to act against the President and violate the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Finally, the resolution claims this rhetoric undermines national security and the chain of command.

Yes

  • Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+1

    The resolution seeks to safeguard the institutional integrity of the military and the safety of troops.

  • Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+1

    The resolution aims to protect the stability of the military chain of command which supports service members.

The opposite

  • Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?-2

    The resolution denounces the speech of specific Members of Congress, which may have a chilling effect on political discourse.