Bill · H.Res. 543· House(119-HRES-543)
Recognizing the right to peacefully protest and condemning violence and authoritarian responses to expressions of dissent.
- Introduced
- 6/25/2025
- Last activity
- 6/27/2025 — Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3021-3022)
- Sponsored by
- Nanette Barragán
- Cosponsors
- - 75 - 0
- Introduced
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution recognizes the right to peaceful protest and condemns violence and authoritarian responses to dissent. It addresses recent immigration enforcement raids by ICE in Southern California and the subsequent protests in downtown Los Angeles. The text notes the activation of the National Guard and the deployment of Marines by the President. It argues these military deployments were done without proper statutory authority or requests from the Governor. Finally, the resolution reaffirms support for First Amendment rights and civil liberties while condemning unlawful acts of violence.
Yes· 3 of 8
Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?+8
The resolution reaffirms the First Amendment right to peaceably assemble and protest.
Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life?+8
The resolution explicitly reaffirms the First Amendment right to peaceably assemble and protest.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+7
The resolution defends the authority of the Governor of California over the deployment of the National Guard.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-6
The resolution argues against the unconstitutional expansion of federal authority via military deployment without state consent.
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-5
The resolution opposes the unauthorized deployment of military and National Guard personnel for domestic law enforcement.
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
The resolution notes that unlawful acts of violence during protests harm small businesses.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Constitutional Rights: The resolution reaffirms support for the First Amendment right to peaceably assemble and protest, as well as civil rights and civil liberties, including the right to due process, for all persons (Resolution sections 1 and 2).
-
Emphasis on Accountability: It emphasizes that all law enforcement, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has a duty to conduct operations with transparency and accountability to the public (Resolution section 4).
-
Recognition of Law Enforcement Efforts: The resolution commends law enforcement officers who worked to protect public safety, enabled peaceful protests, and upheld the rule of law (Resolution section 7).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Increased Tension and Danger from Military Deployment: The deployment of National Guard and active-duty military personnel into a U.S. city without proper statutory authority or coordination is described as a disproportionate response that increases the likelihood of violence and threatens the safety of the public and law enforcement personnel (Whereas clauses).
-
Financial Burden: The deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles is estimated to cost $134 million over a 60-day period (Whereas clause).
-
Harm from Unlawful Acts: Troublemakers who infiltrated peaceful demonstrations committed acts of violence, vandalism, looting, and destruction of property, which harm small businesses and endanger the safety of community members (Whereas clauses).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Freedom Of Speech+8Improves Due Process+7Increase States Rights+7Improves Government Transparency+6Increases Federal Power-6
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Freedom Of Speech+8Improves Policing Reform+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants+5Good For Urban Residents+4Good For Business Owners-3
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Increases Domestic Surveillance-5
- 10/31/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/2/2025
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 6/27/2025
- Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3021-3022)
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/26/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/25/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 62 Cosponsors added.
Pete AguilarDemocrat · California
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Ami BeraDemocrat · California
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Herbert ConawayDemocrat · New Jersey
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Adriano EspaillatDemocrat · New York
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Lizzie FletcherDemocrat · Texas
Laura FriedmanDemocrat · California
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Jimmy GomezDemocrat · California
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Adam GrayDemocrat · California
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Glenn IveyDemocrat · Maryland
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Teresa Leger FernandezDemocrat · New Mexico
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Rick LarsenDemocrat · Washington
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
Sam LiccardoDemocrat · California
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Doris MatsuiDemocrat · California
Joseph MorelleDemocrat · New York
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Nancy PelosiDemocrat · California
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Nellie PouDemocrat · New Jersey
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Raul RuizDemocrat · California
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Luz RivasDemocrat · California
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Linda SánchezDemocrat · California
Eric SwalwellDemocrat · California
Kim SchrierDemocrat · Washington
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Mark TakanoDemocrat · California
Norma TorresDemocrat · California
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Derek TranDemocrat · California
Juan VargasDemocrat · California
Maxine WatersDemocrat · California
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California