Bill · H.Res. 50· House(119-HRES-50)
Recognizing that article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution explicitly reserves to the States the sovereign power to repel an invasion and defend their citizenry from the overwhelming and "imminent danger" posed by paramilitary, narco-terrorist cartels, terrorists and criminal actors who seized control of our southern border.
- Introduced
- 1/16/2025
- Last activity
- 1/16/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Jodey Arrington
- Cosponsors
- - 41 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution recognizes that Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution gives states the sovereign power to repel an invasion and defend their citizens. It states that paramilitary narco-terrorist cartels, terrorists, and criminal actors have seized control of the southern border. The text highlights that from 2021 through 2024, the southern border states of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California were invaded or faced imminent danger. It declares that the United States and the Biden administration failed to protect these states against invasion and failed to faithfully execute the laws. Finally, the resolution finds that any state has the sovereign right to exclude persons who do not have the right to be in the sovereign's territory.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+9
The resolution strongly emphasizes the sovereign right of states to defend themselves against perceived invasions.
Does this tighten control of the border?+8
The resolution asserts state authority to defend against border incursions and manage illegal immigration.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+5
The bill mentions benefits to ranchers and protection for border-state residents.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Would immigrants be better off under this?-8
The resolution focuses on the exclusion and repression of illegal immigrants.
Does this give the federal government more power?-7
The resolution seeks to limit federal oversight by asserting state sovereign power over the border.
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?-5
The resolution targets illegal immigration which disproportionately involves Hispanic populations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
State Right to Exclude: Under resolved clause (1), the bill declares that any state within the United States has the sovereign right to exclude any person who does not have the right to be in the sovereign's territory. This might be considered positive by those who believe states should have direct control over who enters their land.
-
State Authority to Defend: Under resolved clause (2), the text recognizes that states have the sovereign and unilateral authority pursuant to Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution to defend themselves against invasion or imminent danger. This could be viewed as a positive benefit for border states wanting to protect their citizenry from cartels and criminal actors.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Border State Strains: The text notes that from 2021 through 2024, border states spent billions of dollars annually on healthcare, housing, education, and other services for illegal aliens. This might be considered a negative consequence because it drains local resources and burdens taxpayers.
-
Threats to Communities and Quality of Life: The bill points out that the quality of life and security of communities in border states were threatened, with ranchers suffering from stolen and damaged property, healthcare providers experiencing strained capacity, and educators struggling to absorb high volumes of migrant children in classrooms. These outcomes are negative for the residents and workers in those communities.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+5Good For Immigrants-8Good For Hispanic Americans-5
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+5
- Healthcare
- Improves Opioid Crisis Response+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+8Improves Pathway To Citizenship-5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+9Increases Federal Power-7
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 5/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/13/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 1/22/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/16/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 16 Cosponsors added.
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Tim BurchettRepublican · Tennessee
Kat CammackRepublican · Florida
John CarterRepublican · Texas
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Monica De La CruzRepublican · Texas
Jake EllzeyRepublican · Texas
Chuck EdwardsRepublican · North Carolina
Pat FallonRepublican · Texas
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Lance GoodenRepublican · Texas
Tony GonzalesRepublican · Texas
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Diana HarshbargerRepublican · Tennessee
Wesley HuntRepublican · Texas
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
Morgan LuttrellRepublican · Texas
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Michael McCaulRepublican · Texas
Thomas MassieRepublican · Kentucky
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
David RouzerRepublican · North Carolina
John RoseRepublican · Tennessee
Chip RoyRepublican · Texas
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas