Bill · H.R. 9720· House(119-HR-9720)
D.C. Taxing Authority Review Act
- Introduced
- 7/16/2026
- Last activity
- 7/22/2026 — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 18.
- Sponsored by
- James Comer
- Cosponsors
- - 21 - 0
- Introduced
What this bill would do
The ``D.C. Taxing Authority Review Act'' changes how certain District of Columbia laws take effect. It requires that any Act regarding title 47 of the District of Columbia Code or any Act that imposes or increases a tax or fee must be approved by a joint resolution of Congress. Under this bill, these specific Acts will not take effect after the standard 60-day period unless both Houses of Congress pass an approving resolution. The bill also limits debate on these specific resolutions to one hour. These changes apply to Acts transmitted after the bill is enacted.
Yes
Does this give the federal government more power?+5
The bill increases federal oversight by requiring Congressional approval for specific District of Columbia legislative actions.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+2
The bill mandates a specific legislative review process for D.C. taxes and Title 47 matters, subjecting them to formal Congressional action.
Would white Americans be better off under this?+1
The bill provides more Congressional oversight on D.C. fiscal policy, which can be viewed as a check on local government spending.
The opposite· 3 of 7
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-5
The bill reduces the local autonomy of the District of Columbia by mandating federal approval for certain local laws.
Would people in cities be better off under this?-3
The bill may delay the implementation of local laws in Washington D.C. through a new Congressional approval requirement.
Does this repair or build roads and bridges?-3
By requiring Congressional approval for D.C. Acts related to Title 47, which covers many infrastructure matters, the bill may delay local infrastructure funding or regulatory changes.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Congressional Oversight of Taxes and Fees: According to Section 2(a), Acts that impose or increase a tax or fee will require a joint resolution of approval by both Houses of Congress before they can take effect. This provides a layer of Congressional review for financial changes in the District of Columbia.
-
Efficient Legislative Process: Section 2(b) limits debate on these specific resolutions to a total of one hour, divided equally between those in favor and those against. This is intended to expedite the consideration of these specific matters.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Delayed Implementation of Local Laws: Under Section 2(a), Acts related to title 47 of the District of Columbia Code or those increasing taxes or fees will not take effect after the 60-day period unless a joint resolution of approval has passed both Houses and been transmitted to the President. This could prevent local laws from becoming active if Congressional approval is not obtained.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For White Americans+1Good For Urban Residents-3Good For Low Income Households-2Good For Middle Class Households-2
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Corporate Taxes-2Increases Wealthy Taxes-2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Roads And Bridges-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+5Improves Government Transparency+2Increase States Rights-5
- 7/22/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 18.
- 7/16/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 21 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Tim BurchettRepublican · Tennessee
Eric BurlisonRepublican · Missouri
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Elijah CraneRepublican · Arizona
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Pat FallonRepublican · Texas
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Jim JordanRepublican · Ohio
Anna Paulina LunaRepublican · Florida
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Nancy MaceRepublican · South Carolina
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
John McGuireRepublican · Virginia
Scott PerryRepublican · Pennsylvania
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina