DemocratBill · H.R. 9594· House(119-HR-9594)

No PFAS in Cosmetics Act

Rep. Dingell
Age: 73 years
Michigan
Introduced
7/6/2026
Last activity
7/6/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Sponsored by
Debbie Dingell
Cosponsors
Democrat - 9Republican - 1
Health
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill is known as the No PFAS in Cosmetics Act. It amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to ban the use of intentionally added perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances in cosmetics. These are fluorinated organic chemicals containing at least one fully fluorinated methyl or methylene carbon atom. The ban applies to substances intentionally added by a manufacturer or supplier to an ingredient, raw material, product, or packaging, as well as intentional breakdown products of an added chemical. This new ban will apply beginning on January 1, 2027. Finally, the bill repeals section 3506 of the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022.

Yes· 3 of 11

  • Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+8

    Banning toxic perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances reduces environmental pollution from chemical manufacturing and disposal.

  • Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+8

    Banning intentionally added PFAS in cosmetics significantly enhances consumer safety by removing harmful chemicals.

  • Would children be better off under this?+7

    Children benefit from enhanced safety standards and reduced toxic chemical exposure in everyday cosmetic products.

The opposite

  • Would business owners be better off under this?-3

    Cosmetic business owners face increased regulatory costs and the necessity to reformulate product lines.

  • Does this make it easier to run a small business?-2

    The ban on PFAS in cosmetics places compliance and product reformulation burdens on cosmetic manufacturers and suppliers.