Bill · H.R. 9448· House(119-HR-9448)
Federal Workforce Reproductive Rights Protection Act
- Introduced
- 6/24/2026
- Last activity
- 6/24/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- James Walkinshaw
- Cosponsors
- - 35 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Federal Workforce Reproductive Rights Protection Act aims to ensure reproductive healthcare access for Federal employees. It restricts Executive agencies from moving headquarters or significant portions to states on a "Restrictive Location List" compiled by the Comptroller General. The bill also limits the use of funds for leasing or constructing facilities in those specific states. Federal employees are granted the right to opt out of assignments or promotions that would require moving to these restricted locations due to health or family considerations. Additionally, the act provides travel and transportation allowances and administrative leave for those needing to travel for abortion services. Finally, it prohibits the investigation of abortion-related information during security clearance adjudications and personnel actions.
Yes· 3 of 9
Would women be better off under this?+8
The bill explicitly protects reproductive healthcare access and prevents workplace discrimination based on abortion use.
Does this make abortion easier to get?+8
The bill provides travel allowances and paid leave to ensure federal employees can access abortion services outside their resident state.
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+7
The bill prohibits agencies from investigating or using abortion-related information in security clearance and personnel decisions.
The opposite
Is this likely to create jobs?-2
The bill restricts agency headquarters and facility construction in certain states, which may limit job growth in those regions.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-1
The bill increases federal spending through travel allowances and administrative leave for reproductive services.
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?-1
The bill alters security clearance adjudication guidelines regarding reproductive health information.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Job Stability and Career Growth: Federal employees can decline transfers or assignments, and avoid required moves, that would take them to states with restrictive reproductive laws due to medical or family considerations (Section 4).
-
Financial Support for Healthcare Access: Federal employees and their eligible dependents can receive travel and transportation allowances to obtain lawful reproductive health care services not available in their resident state (Section 5).
-
Paid Time Off for Medical Needs: Employees are entitled to leave without loss of pay or service credit to obtain abortion services that require traveling out of their resident state or primary duty station (Section 6).
-
Privacy Protections for Security Clearances: The bill ensures that whether an individual used, traveled for, or supported someone obtaining abortion services cannot be requested, investigated, or considered during the process of determining access to classified information (Section 7).
-
Privacy Protections in Personnel Actions: Executive agencies are prohibited from requesting, investigating, or considering information regarding abortion use or travel for the purposes of any personnel action (Section 7).
-
Protection Against Workplace Retaliation: The act prohibits agencies from taking adverse personnel actions against employees who opt out of assignments, receive travel allowances, or use administrative leave for these purposes (Section 8).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on Agency Growth and Facility Use: Executive agencies are prohibited from moving headquarters or significant portions of their operations to, or constructing/purchasing facilities in, specific states listed as having restrictive reproductive laws (Section 2 and Section 3).
-
Exceptions to Fund Usage Restrictions: Agencies are still permitted to use funds to maintain, repair, or renew leases for existing facilities in restricted states, or for facilities used solely to provide in-person services to the public (Section 3).
-
Limited Scope of Personnel Protections: The protections and definitions provided do not apply to political appointees or members of the Senior Executive Service (Section 11).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Women+8Good For Young Adults+4Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Union Workers+3
- Healthcare
- Improves Abortion Access+8Improves Healthcare Access+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Privacy Rights+7Increases Federal Power+4
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gender Equality+6
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation-2Reduces Government Spending-1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Cybersecurity Defense-1
- 10/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/9/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/30/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/24/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 27 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Diana DeGetteDemocrat · Colorado
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
Christian MenefeeDemocrat · Texas
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Nydia VelázquezDemocrat · New York
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey