DemocratBill · H.R. 8831· House(119-HR-8831)

Protecting Our Democracy Act

Rep. Raskin
Age: 64 years
Maryland
Introduced
5/14/2026
Last activity
5/14/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, House Administration, the Budget, Transportation and Infrastructure, Rules, Foreign Affairs, Ways and Means, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by
Jamie Raskin
Cosponsors
Democrat - 110Republican - 0
Government Operations and Politics
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The Protecting Our Democracy Act, also known as the "Bringing Executive Accountability, Clarity, and Oversight Now Act" or "BEACON Act," aims to prevent abuses of Presidential power and restore government accountability. It implements significant changes to government transparency, oversight, and ethics by regulating national emergencies and presidential communications. The legislation strengthens whistleblower protections, enhances congressional oversight of the budget and subpoenas, and enforces the Emoluments Clauses. It also mandates tax transparency for presidential and vice presidential candidates and establishes an Office of Inspector General within the Executive Office of the President. Furthermore, the act addresses foreign election interference and increases transparency for digital political advertisements.

Yes· 3 of 11

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+9

    Mandates public tax returns for candidates, public visitor logs for the White House, and disclosure of OLC opinions.

  • Does this make elections run better?+8

    Implements strict rules against foreign money and interference in federal and local elections.

  • Does this limit or expose the money behind campaigns?+8

    Requires high levels of transparency for online political ads and taxes of presidential candidates.

The opposite· 3 of 8

  • Would high-income households be better off under this?-4

    Increases transparency and restrictions on wealth-related influence in government.

  • Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-4

    Increases transparency of financial assets through mandatory tax disclosures for candidates.

  • Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?-4

    Increases transparency of financial assets through mandatory tax disclosures for candidates.