Bill · H.R. 8170· House(119-HR-8170)
MATCH Act
- Introduced
- 4/2/2026
- Last activity
- 4/22/2026 — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 36 - 8.
- Sponsored by
- Michael Baumgartner
- Cosponsors
- - 21 - 10
- Introduced
What this bill would do
The MATCH Act aims to restrict the export of certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components to protect national security. It directs agency heads to identify equipment chokepoints and engage diplomatically with allied supplier countries to align export controls. If allies do not adopt these controls, the U.S. will implement its own countrywide restrictions and jurisdiction over specific equipment and facilities. The bill targets entities in countries of concern, specifically mentioning several companies in the People's Republic of China. These measures include a policy of denial for licensing requests to prevent adversaries from accessing essential technology. The Act is set to expire five years after its enactment.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+6
The bill emphasizes diplomatic engagement with allied supplier countries to align export controls and secure technological advantages.
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+5
By controlling semiconductor technology, the bill aims to protect critical infrastructure and advanced computing capabilities from adversary exploitation.
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?+5
The Act mandates prioritized diplomatic efforts to coordinate semiconductor export restrictions with international partners.
The opposite
Does this make trade with other countries easier?-3
The imposition of strict export controls and a policy of denial may create friction in international trade relationships for semiconductor equipment.
Would business owners be better off under this?-2
Strict export controls may impact businesses involved in the semiconductor supply chain or those relying on international technology exchange.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of National Security: The bill seeks to protect the United States' semiconductor advantage, which is described as essential to national security (Section 2).
-
Maintaining Technological Advantage: By implementing controls, the bill aims to protect the U.S. advantage in foundational technologies, such as advanced-node integrated circuits and the equipment required to produce them (Section 2).
-
Global Playing Field: The bill encourages the U.S. to work with allies to align export controls, which is intended to reduce the risk of circumvention and ensure a level global playing field (Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restriction of Trade with Adversaries: The bill mandates comprehensive export controls and a "policy of denial" for many items, which restricts the ability of certain entities and countries to access specific technologies (Section 2 and Section 3).
-
Impact on Allied Supplier Countries: The bill requires diplomatic engagement to pressure allied supplier countries to adopt countrywide controls and licensing policies of denial, which could affect their trade and economic relations (Section 3(b)(1)).
-
Risk of Stockpiling: There is a recognized risk that countries of concern might take advantage of any delays in implementing these controls to further stockpile semiconductor manufacturing equipment (Section 3(d)(1)(A)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+6Improves Cybersecurity Defense+5Improves Diplomatic Engagement+5Improves International Trade-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+4Improves Government Transparency+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners-2
- 10/1/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/12/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/22/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 36 - 8.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/21/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/2/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 10 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Eric CrawfordRepublican · Arkansas
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
Neal DunnRepublican · Florida
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Brad FinstadRepublican · Minnesota
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
Jared GoldenDemocrat · Maine
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Bill HuizengaRepublican · Michigan
Mike HaridopolosRepublican · Florida
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
John JamesRepublican · Michigan
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
John MannionDemocrat · New York
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Christopher SmithRepublican · New Jersey
Marlin StutzmanRepublican · Indiana
Elise StefanikRepublican · New York
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
Jefferson ShreveRepublican · Indiana
Suhas SubramanyamDemocrat · Virginia
Matt Van EppsRepublican · Tennessee
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California
Ryan ZinkeRepublican · Montana