Bill · H.R. 756· House(119-HR-756)
287(g) Program Protection Act
- Introduced
- 1/28/2025
- Last activity
- 1/28/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Michael Cloud
- Cosponsors
- - 17 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The 287(g) Program Protection Act aims to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify how agreements between the federal government and states are handled. It shifts authority from the Attorney General to the Secretary of Homeland Security regarding these agreements. The bill requires the Secretary to enter into written agreements with states or local subdivisions upon request, provided they meet certain qualifications. It establishes strict rules for denying or terminating these agreements, requiring compelling reasons and advance notice. Additionally, the bill mandates uniform training for law enforcement officers and requires annual performance and recruitment reports.
Yes
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+6
The bill expands the ability of states and political subdivisions to enter into and maintain immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government.
Does this tighten control of the border?+5
The bill streamlines the process for states to enter into agreements for local immigration enforcement and apprehension.
Would business owners be better off under this?+1
The bill may impact local labor markets through increased immigration enforcement.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Would immigrants be better off under this?-6
The bill increases the likelihood of apprehension and removal through local law enforcement programs.
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?-5
The bill facilitates more local law enforcement interaction regarding the apprehension and removal of aliens.
Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens?-3
The bill focuses on increasing the apprehension and removal of aliens through local law enforcement agreements.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Flexibility for Local Jurisdictions: The bill allows states or political subdivisions to choose an enforcement model, such as a patrol, task force, or jail model, that they believe is best for their specific needs (Section 2, paragraph 1).
-
Protection Against Arbitrary Agreement Termination: Agreements cannot be ended without a compelling reason, and local entities have the right to appeal a termination through an administrative law judge or a civil action in court (Section 2, paragraph 4).
-
Standardized Officer Training: The Secretary of Homeland Security is required to implement uniform training requirements for law enforcement officers performing immigration functions, aligning with Federal Law Enforcement Training Center standards (Section 2, paragraph 5).
-
Increased Transparency and Accountability: The Secretary must publish annual performance reports that include data on apprehended aliens, removals, oversight methods, and complaints against agencies (Section 4, subsection a).
-
Clearer Timelines for Agreements: The bill requires that the Secretary process requests for agreements with "all due haste," ensuring no more than 90 days pass from a request until the agreement is finalized (Section 2, paragraph 1).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Financial Burden on States or Localities: The bill specifies that law enforcement officers performing these functions will do so at the expense of the State or political subdivision (Section 2, paragraph 1).
-
Requirement for Annual Reporting and Planning: The Secretary of Homeland Security is tasked with the administrative burden of publishing detailed annual performance reports and annual recruitment plans (Section 4, subsections a and b).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+1Good For Immigrants-6Good For Hispanic Americans-5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+6
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending-2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+5Improves Pathway To Citizenship-3
- 10/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/4/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/28/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Josh BrecheenRepublican · Oklahoma
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Nancy MaceRepublican · South Carolina
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
John RutherfordRepublican · Florida
Chip RoyRepublican · Texas
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin